This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Is it time to upgrade our status from GPs to consultant family physicians?

From Dr Mazin Abdalla, Spennymoor, County Durham

After completing my VTS training and qualifying as a GP, my parents congratulated me. My dad asked me politely a quite pivotal question: ‘So when are you going to specialise?’ I was not put off by his question as back home the title ‘general practitioner’ is a title held by any doctor who finishes his internship and is waiting to get specialty training.

I graduated from Sudan, which is a former British colony that adopts the old UK medical jobs hierarchy system. I had to explain to my father that I am a specialist, as I finished specialty training in family medicine in the UK.

The said question and answer made me think, why are GPs not recognised as specialists in the UK? And why is there a separate register in the GMC for GPs instead of recognising us as consultant family physicians?

As we all know, consultants achieve their status by going through a rigorous undergraduate selection process, postgraduate training, undertaking tough Royal college exams, and going through lengthy specialty training programmes. So why are GPs the only ones who are left out of achieving this status?

This inequity can be traced back to the beginning of general practice as we know it today. General practice took shape in the late nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. At that time, GPs were perceived inferior to their hospital colleagues. According to Dr Julian Tudor Hart, GPs were men who failed to become specialists and were unable to work in a hospital or to use its resources without going through their consultant colleagues.[1] Due to this history, our colleagues and some of the public considered GPs as lazy, less knowledgeable and less hardworking. In my experience, some of this attitude still exists in the eyes of our hospital colleagues, even today. One can argue how much of these false impressions are due to the name!

The best motivational quotation that helped me to overcome my own struggle with the above negative statements was: ‘Everybody is a Genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.’[2]This simple statement by Matthew Kelly has changed my perception completely. I now feel that when my clinical knowledge and skills are measured by the number of open heart surgeries that I performed, or the number of brain tumours which I removed, I would feel like a failure but, hold on! These are not my areas of expertise. I learned to look at my profession in the scope of my competency in dealing with patients holistically, managing multi-morbidities and treating all patients without restricting myself to one anatomical system, gender, age, or pathology.

Now let us go back to the name ‘general practitioner’, break it down and analyse it. Firstly, the word ‘general’ is a bit misleading as it does not reflect the fact that we are specialists in managing chronic diseases, acute non-life threatening illnesses and multi-morbidities in the primary care setting. This includes a wide variety of physical and mental health conditions in both genders and in all ages.

Despite sharing this wide spectrum with A&E, we are still known as ‘practitioners’ while they are called ‘consultants’ by the end of our prospective training.

I think it is time to move away from the perception that we are the jack of all trades and master of none. In fact, like any other specialties we work within our limits, refer patients when dealing with conditions that are not within our expertise and receive referrals from colleagues when they are seeking our help in managing chronic illnesses or when dealing with a condition that they have less knowledge about.

The second half of the name which I do not like or agree to, is the word ‘practitioner’. I did not go to medical school and work hard all these years to lose my title as a physician/clinician. For so long you are known as a doctor then the day you are fully qualified you get called a practitioner.

The reason why this is important is in the definition itself. As stated by Wikipedia a consultant is defined as an expert or an experienced professional in a specific field and has a wide knowledge of the subject matter. On the other hand, a practitioner is defined as someone who is qualified or registered to practice a particular occupation, profession or religion. Clearly the word ‘practitioner’ does apply more to traditional healers, yoga or other fields that rely more on practice rather than full and comprehensive training and assessments as in the field of medicine.

My vision for the future of general practice is also shared by the RCGP. I recently read an article on the RCGP website, calling for GPs to be recognised and added to the list of specialists and for the status of GPs to be equal to that of their colleagues in secondary care. It also added that the UK is lagging behind comparable countries as 24 out of 28 EU states, Australia, the USA and Canada all recognize Family medicine as a specialty in its own right.[3]

So, what would the change of the title from general practitioner to consultant family physician achieve?! Well, it will surely reinstate the status that we all aspire to achieve as consultants, while improving the recruitment rate and morale among doctors who are pursuing specialisation in family medicine. It will also reflect and recognise the journey of family medicine since it started until it became a well-established specialty. This includes the foundation of the RCGP in 1952 and the subsequent introduction of VTS training and college exams to improve and monitor the professional excellency of primary care physicians.

I believe that a simple change would go a long way. It is time to upgrade our title to consultant family physicians which will reflect and recognise the journey of general practice from an outcast and undervalued field of medicine to the fully established, respected and exciting specialty of family medicine. We should all, as primary care physicians, stand up for ourselves and demand to be recognised as consultants and to end the discrimination culture and second class treatment by other specialties and organisations like the GMC. If this proposal gets approved it will mean that future generations of family physicians will not have to endure the same injustice we all had to go through by denying us a consultant status for more than 100 years.


1. Tudor Hart, J (1988) A new kind of doctor - Chapter 4: New ideas in old structures [via Socialist Health Association].

2. Kelly, M (1999) The rhythm of life: Living every day with passion and purpose. ISBN 0743265254

3. RCGP and BMA (2016) Joint statement: GPs must be recognised as specialists in general practice 




Related images

  • mazin abdalla online

Rate this article  (4.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (19)

  • consultant primary care physician

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This old chestnut of a question- a favorite of mine.
    Firstly, lets look at Matthew Kellys quote-I disagree that everyone is a genius.I would be happy to amend my view if evidence were to be provided.

    Secondly, I personally feel more robust resources exist for seeking a words definition than Wikepedia, that life-raft for those drowning in a sea of ignorance.

    Lastly, is this a question driven by a need to assuage our egos? I often wonder.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Healthy Cynic

    I'm a GP and proud of it. Those who aspire to become 'consultant family physicians' do, I suspect, want to do a little less consulting and a little more supervising. Stay connected with your patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Turned my back on hospital medicine as an SHO (remember them) in the 1980s and have never regretted doing so. "Consultant" suggests secondary care, the public have no idea what the term Primary Care Physician means.... GP=Family Doctor and that's what we are.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Super slaves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I actually think the term might help address the image problem we have whether we agree with it or not..... we are perceived by the public in someway to be lesser, which we know we are not....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Super slaves! Spot on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SC560

    Young aspiring GPs should do the talking about what they want to be called in the future. With due respect, Not those about to retire and those fond of their GP title. UK is a bit slow to change anyway as they are so very stuck in their tradition and in their pride for it!

    I agree wholeheartedly as someone who would like to go onto GP, that we should definitely support adding a 'consultant' to the name. I don't personally care whether it's family physician or practitioner...

    I personally think that as a GP, it's way harder to be expected to diagnose all the diseases that exist and have the pressure of doing so. It's so much easier to specialise in a certain area though of course more time is spent in training. I can't imagine why hospitalists think they are so much greater than GP. Try doing their job of having derma and then ortho and then cardio popping into the room...and it's impossible to treat a patient without knowing what you are can't possible 'superficially' know about a disease...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree but having asked this very question at the RCGP annual conference a few years ago , it seems the RCGP cant change its name ( Royal warrant, statute and so on) and therefore cant lead this transformation.- par for the course. My job- as a commissioner, trainer and leader of a team is very much that as a Primary Care Consultant rather than a General Practitioner

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say