Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Why we're working towards regulation of the cosmetic industry

From Dr Paul Charlson

In 2013 Sir Bruce Keogh produced a report on non-surgical cosmetic procedures. He concluded that action as the industry was largely unregulated. He said: ’A person having a non-surgical cosmetic intervention has no more protection and redress than someone buying a ballpoint pen or a toothbrush. Dermal fillers are a particular cause for concern as anyone can set themselves up as a practitioner, with no requirement for knowledge, training or previous experience. Nor are there sufficient checks in place with regard to product quality – most dermal fillers have no more controls than a bottle of floor cleaner.’

Sadly the Government has declined to legislate to prevent non-clinical practitioners injecting nor made dermal fillers prescription items. It did however ask Health Education England to produce a set of guidelines to encompass all levels of non surgical cosmetic practice. The report was published at the end of 2015.

On this basis the Department of Health has supported a Joint Council of Cosmetic Practitioners (JCCP) to take forward the report, which I am part of. The British College of Aesthetic Medicine (BCAM) and British Association of Aesthetic Nurses (BACN) have worked together to develop this council. Recently the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) , British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) have agreed to work on the project with a particular focus on setting clinical standards.

The structure of the JCCP is inclusive. Its aims include providing credible regulation and guidance for the public/patients in an unregulated sector, establishing a recognised method to accredit and assess practioners and reducing risk for everyone working in the sector. It also aims to agree a set of clinical standards that can be used for registration and the development of a set of recognised training qualifications and programmes.

There will be a register of practitioners and two separate advisory bodies, the clinical standards board and a devices and equipment committee, both of which will work in tandem with the JCCP.

It is early days but it looks hopeful that at last this industry will have proper regulation.

Dr Paul Charlson is a GP in Brough, East Yorkshire and strategic medical director of One Medical Group

Rate this article  (1 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • This is dumb and just done to make jobs for the boys.
    You do not need doctors to supervise all non-surgical cosmetic proceedures!!!
    Or do you think that people will require a doctor to put on a mud face mask????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent eventually some guidance for practice managers to ensure saftey for patients and a framework to guide managers on how to regulate and manage practices in this grey atea

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.