Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The BMA has the power to save general practice, but its message is not loud or clear enough to do so

Representing the profession has become a titanic struggle, writes Dr Anthony O’Brien

If we were to liken the NHS to a large cruise ship crossing the Atlantic then doctors would be the crew.  From time to time over the years, the Shipping Company (the Government, in this analogy) has threatened dramatic changes in how the whole enterprise runs.  This always causes enormous disquiet amongst the crew but ultimately only ever seems to lead to people rearranging the deckchairs on the poop deck. The Big Man Aft (or BMA, for short) is the link between the crew and its officers (for GPs, NHS management). Some like him, some despise him but many just ignore him.  

The BMA has significant difficulties in delivering the leadership their members want. Complications of trade union laws, the cliquey world of medical politics and the lack of interest most doctors show for attending any sort of meeting, mean there are often communication problems amongst doctors trying to promote or engage with political activity.  

This was emphasized at this year’s BMA Conference when the delegates voted down a motion that suggested last year’s strike action was a debacle, a damp squib and a big mistake.  In the debate itself, few disputed these descriptions, but they still could not bring themselves to vote against the central committee who had orchestrated the whole shambles.

We never wanted to strike

The fact that the vast majority of doctors did not strike suggests that the profession wants to turn to other, more professional, forms of protest.  For instance, the Health & Social Care Bill says it is illegal for GP practices to leave CCGs, and GP practices could have their funding revoked for not paying for CQC registration.  

But surely we live in a Western democracy. Why have we allowed Governments to pass laws that insist on us belonging to organisations?

Our most powerful political card is the potential non-compliance with commissioning.  The Government have built their health strategy around this philosophically-potholed policy.  The BMA say their hands are legally tied.  But the place to test and debate legality is a court room, so that is where we should be threatening to go.  If we believe in the NHS we need to be prepared to fight for it in court rather than on a picket line.

Iceberg ahead

Back to the cruise ship, which has just entered foggy waters; no-one is sure where it is heading.  The officers are concentrating on entertaining the passengers and keeping the shipping company happy.  Most of the crew take the pragmatic view that, while they are on the ship, they might as well do their best to sail it safely.

The main problem, of course is that there are too many passengers on the ship. The shipping company does not want to address this problem and are quite happy with their ‘iceberg solution’.  The officers are trying to convince the crew that being more efficient with gangways and passenger traffic will overcome the fundamental space/people imbalance. But the BMA and all the crew need to continue to loudly point out that these strategies are not going to work.

This will be a difficult political message to convey since neither the Government, NHS managers nor patients wish to hear it.  It is political suicide to threaten the concept of a free NHS, and patients do not want to pay any more tax.

But doctors need to contribute to the vision of a sustainable NHS should look like in the future: after all, if the ship goes down, it is the crew and passengers who will be the biggest losers. The BMA needs to take a lead in helping us formulate and construct our vision, even if this requires the discussion of many unpalatable choices.  We need to fight for our principles, and call politicians and the public to their senses about their unrealistic wishes.

The message from our professional leaders needs to be clearer.  We need a website easily accessible by grassroots GPs informing us of what is going on and why.  Every day each of the UK’s 30,000-plus GPs sees 30-plus patients. This adds up to a million political opportunities a day to influence voters regarding the direction the NHS needs to travel in.  If we all deliver the same message, we will be an unstoppable psephological force.  

And so back to our allegory: the Big Man Aft may need to be brave. He has always been scrupulous to never break his contract, never do anything that could in anyway be interpreted as illegal.  However, if as the fog clears it appears we are heading into icy waters, he may need to weigh up what is the morally responsible position to take.  Telling the crew to keep cleaning the cabins, conducting the orchestra and serving the food or instigating mutiny.  

Small defiant breaches of contract would soon have the passengers asking questions, the company up in arms and, if all the crew are complicit, the officers might decide to change course - rather than continue full steam ahead towards the iceberg.

Dr Anthony O’Brien is a GP in Silverton, Devon and chair of Devon LMC.

Readers' comments (6)

  • Or perhaps you could recruit your crew from Cuba in order to make provision for all the passengers.

    Cuba trains and recruits 3x the number of doctors per capita as the UK, but pays them just above the national minimum wage.

    Cubans get good healthcare and Cuban doctors work for the good of others, not purely for self-enrichment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @2.22. This is a site for doctors. Please take your nonsense elsewhere. Doctors in this country provide an excellent service and are sick of facing the abuse that is being spouted against them. We will go where we are valued and can make a difference. If many leave, as are doing now, the NHS will collapse literally.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Anonymous 8:07pm

    Thanks for your considered response. A couple of points:

    1) This site is for "health professionals".

    2) A large number of articles on this site are devoted to how doctors can increase their income (sometimes by reducing/rationing patient care) - why shouldn't these goals be open to analysis and discussion?

    3) Why is any comparative analysis of the supply side of healthcare in different nations construed as "abuse" of doctors?

    4) The writers of these articles are keen to say what concessions patients or the government should make in hard times, but never what concessions the profession should make or how NHS resources could be better shared out for the benefit of patients (rather than the benefit of healthcare staff).

    5) Do you think that doctors in Cuba don't "make a difference" or "feel valued"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @8:54
    are you suggesting uk doctors work purely for 'self enrichment?'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It might be helpful to the NHS if DOH launched a recruitment drive in Cuba -- I can't actually find locums let alone a replacement partner at present.

    Of course, it would be important that any such doctors met the requirements for registration and independent practice in the UK.

    nb Interesting that the anonymous commentator choose a Marxist state as his recruiting ground.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about Zimbabwe ? Barristers there do not make a million pounds nor do doctors earn £ 3.00 take home pay per consultation as they do in the UK.
    When are we doctors going to resign from the NHS and just accept what the market will pay. The USA for all its wealth cannot get family doctors. Perhaps they should look to Cuba.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say