Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Why I think shared medical appointments will work in the UK

Dr Rob Lawson describes the benefits of this new consultation model

With rising workloads, restricted funding and patients with ever more complex conditions, change is needed in general practice. One solution is to adopt the American and Australian model of shared medical appointments (SMAs) – seeing patients with long-term conditions in a group, instead of giving individual 10 minute appointments.

After a slow start, SMAs have taken off in the US as a better way of managing the 70% of GP consultations that are now due to long term conditions that require more complex care than the infectious diseases of the past.

They work by a doctor seeing patients in groups of 8-12 for 60 or 90 minutes, where they discuss their problems sequentially (like an individual consultation), but within a supportive group that allows patients to listen, interact and learn from each other. The patients can all have one condition (for example diabetes, heart problems or pain management) or a mix of conditions (for example, a group of patients with long-term conditions).

SMAs offer great advantages to patients: more time with the doctor, peer support from fellow patients and input from other allied health professionals. SMAs also require a facilitator who organises the group, keeps medical records, guides the doctor through individual consultations, and may contribute to the consultation. Patients claim they learn more, don’t have to remember all the questions they usually forget to ask (because others ask them) and actually enjoy the process better than their usual care.

It is likely that SMAs will become just another part of the UK’s medical furniture.

Importantly, doctors also claim to enjoy the SMA as a welcome break from the routine 1:1 consulting, as they only have to have one discussion on diet, exercise, stress management and the lifestyle changes that underpin most chronic diseases, and not repeat it ad nauseam. Seeing the patients also saves the GP precious time, as they don’t have to repeat themselves, they have a documenter to take notes, a nurse to check metrics before they arrive and no DNAs.

There is plenty of research to support their success. A study funded by the Royal Australian College of GPs in Australia found that after 24 groups with more than 200 patient visits, all the signs were positive. As with published US data, there is almost 100% acceptance of the process with patients and doctors involved in the trials. And while these are admittedly self-selected, earlier work suggests that this level of satisfaction jumps from around an initial 75% to 100% once the process is tried.

GPs may, understandably, be skeptical about the concept. We have been brought up with a 1:1 consulting model yet there are more than 500 white papers telling us that SMA outcomes are as good or better.

Another potential barrier is inertia – GPs are overwhelmed as it is. But with a 40% reduction in patient return rates and a halving of time spent on surgeries, SMAs have to be viewed as serious adjuncts to usual consulting.

Meanwhile, patient and doctor satisfaction is very high – smiles on faces makes the daily workload happier for everyone in the whole practice. And patients sign a confidentiality waiver which has worked very well without a single resulting complaint.

Some up-skilling will be required for nurses and others to act as facilitators (or documenters who enable GPs to escape from their computers) but this should be minimal given a basic level of core competencies and specific health knowledge.

It is likely that SMAs will become just another part of the UK’s medical furniture.

Dr Rob Lawson is a retired NHS GP in East Lothian, currently working as a Lifestyle Medicine specialist, private GP and a health charity director.

Conflict of interest note: Dr Rob Lawson intends to run a training course for SMA facilitators.

Rate this article  (1.71 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (12)

  • No. I just want 15 minutes per consultation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • but would this work in the entitlement culture in the UK? you would probably get 10 people all asking for MRI scans for 'pain all over' for 60 minutes. or they will want to talk about 10 different problems if giving this kind of forum.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh - give me strength!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why don't we make it even more enjoyable for patients? A social event with food and booze ,huh? 40% reduction in re-attendance my a$$. More like " lets set up camp here, its lovely "
    Your conflict of interest note says it all mate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Have you heard of lifestyle coaches? COPD/Asthma/Diabetes nurses? When you trained to be a GP, holding peoples hands was part of the job. Patient demand and diseases were tame then. Today we deal with real pathology, polypharmacy, mental health, drugs, alcohol and massive hysteria/demand. We do not have the time to babysit. Go sell your product somewhere else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Your conflict of interest note says it all mate."

    You read it as a cynical drumming up of business. But surely equally it could be a sign of a doctor discovering something he really believes in, and trying to encourage its wider adoption?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a fantastic approach for dieticians, practice nurses, physiotherapists etc. But not GPs. Why? Because we have to use our extensive skills and training to try and make sense of a load of garbage going in and get some plausible, safe and cost effective outcomes out. This is only done through high level individual listening and consulting skills. As someone has already posted, we are not babysitters. We are the most efficient part of the health service and this is a bit like 7 day access - an unecessary luxury

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent idea. I have contemplated a similar format for my COPD patients, and this article encourages me to initiate it in my practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Shaba Nabi above. I think it would work with Nurses, Physio, Dietician etc etc. I'd be suprised if some surgeries don't do something along these lines already!
    1:1 with the GP is about confidentiality, some questions/problems can't be expressed in a group.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Shaba Nabi above. I think it would work with Nurses, Physio, Dietician etc etc. I'd be suprised if some surgeries don't do something along these lines already!
    1:1 with the GP is about confidentiality, some questions/problems can't be expressed in a group.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say