Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Walk-in centres under cost scrutiny

I found the article about the oppression of Andrew Bargery by the GMC (News, June 4) most distressing.

The case examiners at the GMC could have sorted out this problem in about 10 minutes if they had:

·established the complaint related solely to the completion of an IB113 incapacity form

·acquainted themselves with the information on the back of every form Med 3, stating that the Department for Work and Pensions can seek information from a patient's doctor

·established there were no grounds for complaint whatsoever and told the patient very firmly to go away.

I do not know quite how the GMC expects to be able to fully explore cases where there are genuine concerns when it is wasting its time on nonsense like this.

I sincerely hope Dr Bargery is speaking to his lawyers about the possibility of taking action against the faceless morons who put him through what was clearly a very distressing experience.

Dr AM Gath

Shelton, Stoke on Trent

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say