This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

WHO stance on homeopathy could harm Third World

The WHO is being too slow to revise its 4-year long endorsement of homeopathic remedies for childhood diarrhoea.

The WHO is being too slow to revise its 4-year long endorsement of homeopathic remedies for childhood diarrhoea.

On 6-7 June, a conference entitled "Homeopathy for developing countries" took place in the Netherlands. It was sponsored by two of the largest manufacturers of homeopathic remedies (Heel and Helios). The subjects included topics such as

• Theory of epidemics and its significance in treatment AIDs in Tanzania, a homeopathic journey (Jeremy Sherr)

• Treating malaria with homeopathy in Tanzania (Sigsbert Rwegasira)

• Malaria and research (Martien Brands)

Other topics were TB, influenza and infant diarrhoea. The programme includes statements like "a small set of remedies is often enough to treat acute diseases" or "we believe homeopathy is ideal for third world countries". Needless to say that there is no good evidence to show that homeopathy would generate any meaningful benefit for people suffering from these infections.

A group of early career medics and researchers, many of whom have worked in developing countries, were quite obviously alarmed by all this. They decided to write to the WHO pointing out that homeopathy is not an effective treatment for these conditions and asking the WHO to make it clear that homeopathy can neither prevent nor treat any of them. "Those of us working with the most rural and impoverished people of the world already struggle to deliver the medical help that is needed. When homeopathy stands in the place of effective treatment, lives are lost", the letter states.

This letter comes at a time when the WHO might be about to publish a major report on homeopathy. The draft of this document has been heavily criticised in the Lancet because it seemed an exercise in cherry picking the evidence for homeopathy, while the evidence against it was neglected. Thus it explicitly endorsed the treatment of childhood diarrhoea with homeopathic remedies!

This was 4 years ago. The WHO has told me recently that they are still revising their document – quite a revision that takes that long, if I may say. Perhaps the WHO was so embarrassed that they binned the whole thing? Just dreaming – so sorry.

Professor Edzard Ernst Recent posts

My response to the British Chiropractic Association 18 June 09
Are chiropractors destroying their own reputation?> 04 Jun 09
There's no such thing as a 'negative' result 01 June 09
Percy, Pavlov and placebo in animals 26 May 09
If the evidence supports it, so will I 18 May 09
Herbal 'detox' treatments spread a poisonous message 14 May 09
CAM practitioners share some of the blame for measles epidemic 07 May 09
Homeopaths ride to swine flu rescue 06 May 09
Just because a patient gets better, doesn't mean their treatment worked 28 April 09
Homeopathy for cancer is nothing more than placebo 23 April 09
Do complementary and alternative therapies do more harm than good? 20 April 09
Don't let your practice become an evidence-free zone 15 April 09
Natural doesn't mean safe. And CAM is neither 06 April 09

So-called 'integrated medicine' is disturbing nonsense 30 March 09

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say