This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Why can't we all be GPs?

I fully endorse the suggestion that a name change is needed from the negative non-principal title. I suggest we should be called 'independent GPs'. This gives status to our role, and emphasises the fact that we are neither attached to a practice (as an 'assistant'), nor an employee of the NHS bureaucracy, (as a 'principal' under the NHS).

It paves the way for independent GPs offering private sessions as an alternative to the increasing hoop-jumping and petty restrictions imposed on poor 'principals'.

Dr John Marr, independent GP

Hundon, Suffolk

While non-principals are agonising over what to call themselves. consider this: from next April there will be no such thing as a 'principal'. When I was a council member of the National Association of Non-Principals way back when, I made the following suggestion: why don't we call ourselves 'GPs'? It works for me. It was evidently too radical at the time, but times change.

Dr Peter Harvey, Norfolk

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say