This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Would your practice be a winner or loser?

Loser

Rural

• Rural GMS practice with a list size of 4,000 relatively old patients.

• Low additional needs.

• Under the current formula overall practice weighting is 1.11.

• Under revised formula, weighting falls to 0.95, or 1.09 with rurality adjustment.

Winner

Inner London

• Inner-London GMS practice with a list size of 5,361 relatively young patients.

• High additional needs.

• Under current formula overall practice weighting is 1.14.

• Under revised formula weighting would rise substantially to 1.28, or 1.20 with rurality adjustment.

Loser

Urban

• Urban PMS practice in a blue collar area of moderate means with practice list of 6,709.

• Age-sex index is above average with high additional needs.

• Weighting 1.21 under the current formula.

• Weighting drops dramatically to 1.07, or 1.06 with rurality adjustment.

Loser

Market town

• Large market town PMS practice with 16,567 comparatively affluent patients on list.

• Above average age-sex mix but low additional needs.

• Under current formula practice weighting is 1.02.

• Under revised formula weighting falls to 0.96, or 0.92 with rurality adjustment.

Winner

Young patients

• GMS practice with relatively young population of 8,595.

• High additional needs.

• Under current formula overall practice weighting is 1.17.

• Under revised formula weighting rises to 1.30, or 1.24 with rurality.

Unclear

Suburban

• GMS practice of 5,576 patients in a suburban area of moderate means.

• Age-sex weighting above average and additional needs comparatively high.

• Overall weighting under current formula is 1.09.

• New formula weighting would increase to 1.10,

or fall to 1.07 with rurality adjustment.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say