Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The Friends and Family Test treats GPs like B&B owners

The BMA must renegotiate our duty to put our patients through this questionnaire, argues Dr Brian Fisher

The Friends and Family Test will be a contractual requirement from October 2014. The test question will be: ‘How likely are you to recommend our practice to friends and family if they needed similar care or treatment?’

It looks simple and straightforward. But it isn’t.

It comes from the corporate world as a measure of brand loyalty, and is not actually designed to enable organisations to improve the care they offer to patients. In fact, of course, it isn’t designed for the NHS at all.

It is not useful for the NHS as it doesn’t tell us much about quality of care, nor is it helpful to inform patients.

Hospitals currently using it might have thousands of replies, but the test doesn’t actually advise them on how to improve the system based on this feedback. It looks them blankly in the face if the score is low.

The dangers for general practice in a worst case scenario are, if we just use the FFT as it is currently imposed, loss of GP morale, poor advice to patients about the quality of local GP care, misrepresentation of GPs, and loss of income following loss of reputation (or unworkable numbers of patients joining a practice that apparently performs well). We are not B&Bs - bad reviews affect NHS patients as well as NHS surgeries.

Another way

Rapid honest and clear feedback to practices should and could be an important driver for improving care and making life better for patients and practices. But only if the feedback is useful and shows the direction in which we need to travel.

The FFT should not be used on its own in a GP setting, and adding one original question to the questionnaire is not likely to transform the exercise into a useful one. Additional questions may be poorly-designed, or shaped to obtain a predictable response - making the test a meaningless waste of GP time.

NHS Alliance has worked with iWantGreatCare to develop a supplement of validated questions to provide meaningful feedback, and the questions are already available. Patient responses are logged and published anonymously on a website that covers all local GP practices. Feedback on individual GPs from the validated questions can be used to meet development, appraisal and revalidation needs. All feedback is monitored to prevent gaming and system abuse

But ultimately, the BMA should renegotiate the obligation to do the FFT. GPs deserve better. We need to embrace the idea of rapid clear feedback – but in a way that we can understand and harness for better care. The BMA should renegotiate to ensure a more relevant and appropriate approach.

Dr Brian Fisher is a GP in south east London, and the patient and public involvement lead for NHS Alliance.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Took Early Retirement

    The BMA is not capable of negotiating its way out of a wet paper bag.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP's spend years training yet have to prove they can do the most basic examinations, it is a disgrace the ay they are being treated, given that half of those doing the judging have never worked ion a GP practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Following the example of the hotel in Blackpool will surgeries be allowed to fine patients for a bad review?
    More seriously, what statistical credibility can be given to any consumer survey to which you may only be invited to take part by the contractor? This degenerates further as each day passes, is there anyone in NHS England who monitors the stupidity of their proposals?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say