Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

How allowing one million patients to consult their GP online solved our appointments shortage

Dr Arvind Madan explains how his group of practices developed a way to make their website more accessible for patients and more efficient for GPs

What we did

The Hurley Group is an NHS GP Partnership that operates practices and urgent care services in London. However, we were struggling to cope with patient demand for appointments. In 2013-14 we ran a pilot across 133,000 patients in 20 practices encouraging patients to use the practice websites as a ‘click first’ approach to accessing care.

The websites were enriched with self-management tools like symptom checkers and self-help materials. Patients could also choose to email their practice from the website using structured questionnaires that turned into eConsult summaries. These summaries came through to GPs in pdf form, allowing them to triage patients into those that needed an appointment, those requiring a phone call and those that could be managed based on the eConsult summary alone, for example with a prescription or fit note.

The questionnaires include red-flag questions that intercept patients with serious symptoms and direct them to urgent care services. This was an essential element of the model to avoid a significant event, for example when a patient eConsulted out of hours and didn’t realise their symptoms were urgent.

Using eConsult also ensured the whole history was taken in one go rather than the back and forth of email.

Results

The pilot demonstrated improvements in access, health outcomes and practice efficiency.

The patients were able to get immediate access to self-management tools from a trusted source, their GP website, and 95% of patients described their experience as good or excellent.

A third of patients used self-management tools and 18% then didn’t request the GP appointment they had planned to book. This means less demand for face-to-face appointments and shorter waiting times.

40% of patients were managed using the eConsult summary alone, 20% with an additional phone call and 40% needed a face-to-face appointment. All patient contacts, on the phone and in person were faster as the GP already had the patient history.

For every eConsult received, up to nine other patients used the self-management tools. Each eConsult took 2.9 minutes for a GP to review, so by reviewing only three eConsults, up to 30 patients benefitted from the GP’s ten minutes, equivalent to one appointment slot. Additionally, this service helped patients become more knowledgeable on how to manage their own issues.

The system diverted patients who were mostly planning to book an appointment. This minimised any supply-led demand - only 3% of patients who eConsult were not already planning seeked medical help. There was also an increased uptake of online booking and repeat prescribing.

Challenges

Ensuring patients are adequately informed of the service is key. Practices are asked to make sure they tell patients about it, put it on their answer machine message and place a prominent banner on their website.

Another challenge, which has strengthened the model, has been working with the medical defence organisations on an approved clinical governance model e.g. red-flagging serious symptoms.

The next steps

Although the existing model works with any software system, EMIS Health are working on automating the process for the eConsult to be integrated into the patient record. Work is also being done to code data such as smoking and alcohol status (two questions asked on every eConsult) to help practices gather this information for QOF. This will be available during the first quarter of 2016.

This started as an internal project in 2013, but is now available to over one million patients throughout England. This is set to increase as Hurley has now teamed up with the EMIS Health to assist with deployments, and so Hurley can focus on improving the model further. We are keen to stress that it should not be used to devalue the importance of what GPs do in a consultation – this human connection can never be replaced. However, it may serve as an example of what GPs can do with technology to improve their own efficiency for some scenarios.

Dr Arvind Madan is a GP Partner in the Hurley Group in London

Rate this article  (3.38 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (2)

  • I feel it is shockingly negligent to issue a fit note on the basis of looking at a serious of tick boxes on a form.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clarification - We would not claim online self-management and eConsult has "solved" our appointment shortage, but it has certainly helped.

    In relation to comment on issue of fit notes based on tick boxes, what we are doing is giving patients the chance to send in their request and giving the GP the chance to see whether they need to come in, or whether it can be managed without using an appointment slot e.g. over the phone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say