Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

One million patients to receive 'personalised' GP care, says health minister

One million elderly patients will benefit from a ‘personalised and proactive GP service’ from next year under the Government’s plans for a ‘named GP’ to take overall responsibility for their care, says a health minister.

Care minister Norman Lamb said that the plans - announced yesterday - would place GPs in a position of accountability for ‘all aspects’ of their care and would include the frail elderly as well as those with mental health problems.

He added that a separate care coordinator would work alongside to ensure that the elderly do not ‘fall through the cracks’ and that this would form the first part of a three-pronged ‘Vulnerable Older People Plan’ which the Government will roll out in a bid to ensure that the NHS can provide a sustainable service as this group grow rapidly in numbers.

The health secretary Jeremy Hunt said yesterday that the GP contract will change to include a responsibility for practices to provide a ‘named GP’ responsible for co-ordinating all the out-of-hospital care for vulnerable older people from next year

Speaking at the DH’s ‘Vulnerable Older People Plan’ engagement even in London on Wednesday, Mr Lamb added more detail to the plans, saying they were important to ensure that patients know that someone has overall responsibility and accountability for their care.

He said: ‘It is not acceptable for an older person to be shunted from one institution to another, sometimes falling through the gaps in between with no one ultimately taking overall responsibility for their care.

‘So about one million older people, with the most complex health needs, will get a personalised, proactive GP service which will include first of all a GP overseeing all aspects of their care.

‘That doesn’t mean doing everything but overseeing, ensuring that they are treated as a person and not just a set of conditions, and looking to see where improvements can be made and that these are properly followed up. Secondly, a separate care coordinator who will work with a range of experts to ensure that the plan is delivered.’

He added that the Government’s ongoing project to better integrate health and social care and the creation of a shared electronic care record would also improve elderly care.

Mr Lamb said: ‘We have created a £3.8bn transition fund for 2015/16 as part of the spending review to join up health and social care. You may think that is a long way off, but we are expecting every area of the country to start their planning now.

‘Some areas are well on the road, but others are simply not making the progress that is necessary, still working in silos, still allowing people to fall through the gaps in an unacceptable way.’

But GP leaders at the event said the reforms would only be possible if the Government funded an expansion of general practice and reduced bureaucracy in practices’ day-to-day work.

NHS Alliance chair Dr Michael Dixon said: ‘It seems to me that this is a real chance for a renaissance of general practice, for the service to focus on people rather than diseases and move away from the tick-box culture of the QOF and get back to our values and our professional roots.

‘Reseach [has shown] that if you want to improve health and reduce costs you have to invest in primary care. Successive Governments have failed to do that, so this is a move exactly in the right direction.’

Meanwhile, NAPC chair Dr Charles Alessi, who was also on the panel, called for a system-wide reorganisation of payment systems within the NHS, arguing that hospitals cannot continue to be paid by results while general practice received capitation-based payments - drawing spontaneous applause from Mr Lamb.

He said: ‘One of the most important things [that we need to do] is to manage the currencies better, because we still have a system which is capitated around primary care while it is wholly activity based in hopitals and having that system is completely illogical and nonsensical. That needs to be managed, and needs to be managed now.’

Meanwhile, members of the audience questioned how single-handed GPs would be able to oversee all aspects of care for all of their patients. Mr Lamb responded that he ‘shares the concern’ but did not elaborate on how the DH plans to tackle this obstacle to their plans.

 

Readers' comments (11)

  • Joined up care needs a national health service - not this fragmented mess . Dump the internal market

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't really get it. Don't we do this already? Or are we to be "responsible" for the crap provision of elderly care or shortcomings in nursing homes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another terrible idea ill thought out put together to win votes I'm off to Wales

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think MP's must think we are all like doc Martin , with one or two quirky and agreeable patients to deal with a day.
    Scottish Statement for fees and allowances state
    capitation fee of £ 51.15 for those over 75.

    Will private Health companies "cherry pick" @ that level of funding!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this is a great idea. Hopefully if I provide 24 hour care on an activity based protocol I may be able to buy myself a new polyester cardigan. I don't like my wife or children so I welcome the opportunity to spend as little time as possible in their company. I love paying 3 times as much as a consultant for my pension. I thank providence that I was born without gonads lest I may man up and leave the NHS. Ex pat GP

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Im a clinician! NOT a care co-ordinator and should not be responsible for co-ordinating social or other non medical care. The roles and responsibilities are getting bigger by the day and we as GPs are loosing sight of what our real purpose is: providing MEDICAL CARE. Especially as these other care services such as social care are chronically underfunded. How can I have responsibility for areas not under my control which are in any case chronically underresourced and outside my area of training and expertise? General practice has been and always will be a generic dumping ground.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have no objection taking responsibility for the medical care - been doing that for years already. I have neither the time nor the inclination to oversee social care provision - other than making the necessary referrals. There has to be a limit to our responsibility. How long before we are accused of 'playing God' by trying to do everything. I wish I could speak to patients like Doc Martin.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • err... I do this already? I thought this is what GPs did?

    ...makes a good headline though....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't think it is acceptable to tell individual GPs they are responsible for something without allowing individual GPs the power to change things.

    I tried to get emergency extra care at home for a demented patient who had indicated she never wanted to return to hospital to be told by the social worker that she must have a medical cause for her decline and she should go to hospital. Took a lot of shouting to prevent it. To then suggest I am responsible for poor social care provision is not really okay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • mission creep 24 hr responsibility return

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say