This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Practices forced to re-open lists in crisis area leading to patient safety concerns

Exclusive All three practices in a Norfolk town have been told to reopen their patient lists by commissioners, despite concerns over patient safety due to GPs having to care for more than 3,000 patients each, Pulse has learned.

All lists at GP practices in the East Dereham area in Norfolk have been closed for the past two and a half years.

But last month, NHS South Norfolk CCG advised the Theatre Royal Surgery, Toftwood Medical Centre and Orchard Surgery practices that their practice lists would reopen in October.

One practice posted a message to patients on its website warning that there are 9,000 patients on their lists, but only 2.75 full-time GPs.

GP leaders said there was 'trepidation’ at the move from the practices involved.

This move comes after Pulse revealed the areas of the UK where practices are having to close their lists due to extreme pressures on general practice, while the BMA is considering whether to ballot GPs on mass list closure to highlight the problems in general practice.

A note on the website of the Theatre Royal Surgery explained the problems faced by practices in the town.

It said: ’Theatre Royal Surgery applied to NHS England for the practice list to remain closed for a further 12 months from 31 August 2017. The reason for this was to enable us to preserve the excellent service that we are able to offer to our existing patients.

’Our application was declined and we are unable to appeal this decision for three months. Now all practices in the Dereham area will be accepting new patient registrations.

’The practice currently has over 9,000 registered patients being cared for by 2.75 full time equivalents GP’s and whilst we will strive to offer a professional and clinically safe service to all our patients old and new, your understanding of the pressures currently faced in general practice is appreciated.’

Dr Ian Hume, medical chair of the Norfolk and Waveney LMC said that the closed lists were originally precipitated by a practice having ’difficulty recruiting, resulting in high list sizes consequently the practices applied to close their lists on the grounds of patient safety’, which was fully supported by the LMC.

He added: 'Unfortunately this resulted in a domino effect and all practices in the town also had to follow suit and applied to close their lists. A system of allocation has been in place since. Various initiatives have been tried to relieve some the workload pressure including locality nurses supporting care homes and NHS targeted recruitment but unfortunately the fundamental problems are based on nationally recognised problems of excessive workload, inadequate investment in primary care, poor recruitment and retention.

’Practices in the town and surrounding villages have worked very closely together supported by the CCG. All the lists of have opened from 1 October 2017 and we are monitoring the situation very carefully. Understandably there is some trepidation in relation to this move.’

A spokesperson for the NHS South Norfolk CCG said: ‘Prior to April 2017 the responsibility for primary care contracting and approving practice closed list applications sat with NHS England. During this period patients were allocated fairly to practices. Under co-commissioning and now full delegated commissioning the CCG has worked with the practices and NHS England to develop and implement plans to transition the practices from a closed list to open list status.’

Practices closing lists en masse

Mass list closures have become increasingly common as practices struggle to cope with increasingly workloads.

Last month, the Department of Health urged the BMA to consider how patients would fare if it were to put its threat of collective practice list closures into action.

Seven practices in Folkestone – which cover around 64,000 patients - have applied to NHS South Kent Coast CCG for formal list closure, saying there is a shortage of 16 full-time equivalent GPs.

This is the latest in a growing number of towns that have had to close their lists en masse, including Bridlington in East Riding of Yorkshire and the Three Towns area in Ayrshire, Scotland.

This move also comes after a survey of GP practices by the BMA revealed half of practices were willing to close their lists in response to the pressures facing general practice.

 

Readers' comments (21)

  • Just Your Average Joe

    If all the practices handed back contracts and resigned - leaving providing the care in the hands of commissioners - and then they had to find staff or leave practices with no care - in a difficult to recruit area market forces would come into play.

    If no-one was prepared to locum for under £200 per hour (perhaps initially more realistically £150 per hour), then the same GPs would be paid to do some work, and loose the stress and day to day worries of targets, QOF and enhanced services etc, and just do a session's work and go home to rest.

    There are not enough GP's in the UK and perhaps this is the best way for GP's to be valued at their true worth, rather than begging JH and DOH for an extra couple of pounds, when millions are wasting in pointless reorganisations, PFI black holes, and hospital deficits.

    I am a long standing supporter for partnerships, but sometimes you need to loose something you value before its real worth is known.

    A few brave souls who take this path and just like the measly amount the DOH valued OOH provision, they will realise the true cost of handing partnership contracts to Private providers who are given huge APMS premiums which are not available to GMS/PMS colleagues.

    APMS practices can take £125 per patient as a baseline when GMS is sitting on less than £80 for providing GP services - hardly a level playing field.

    If practices did hand back contracts GP funding would need to double to provide a much poorer and hap hazard level of care.

    If anyone with a brain from the DOH is reading this - act now to save the NHS by investing in the partnership model.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I cannot remember anybody in the league of Lord Vader, Ozzy , Agent Hunt , Master Yoda , MojoBojo and Auntie May answering directly the question,
    ‘Do you think this situation of so many GP practices closing down , is caused by Tory party’s policies?’

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    Perhaps they could get some of the GPs in the area to go do regular shits in their local a&e to help out the poor folks at the hospital. After all that’s where virtually the entire health care budget is being spent. Perhaps that might be the solution?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Oh , missing one
    Harvey Dent

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think we need to get rid of the regular shits on the front bench first.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Who we are":

    http://www.southnorfolkccg.nhs.uk/about-us/who-we-are

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would only poo in A&E for £300 per hour and crown indemnity.Once I had opened my bowels I might do clinical work for double this rate,no way matey,would not work in A&E ever again would rather have my eyes remove with a lollipop stick.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    Omg ..I meant shifts not sh@ts

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @just your average Joe

    That is exactly what i was about to write.
    1 - team up and hand back contract.
    2 - can locum at the same practice in the meantime, charge whatever you like.
    3 - once NHSE realise they don't actually know how to run an efficient practice they will tender it out on APMS - bid of it at GMS +50% or GMS+100%.

    Then use all the extra money to attract salaried doctors for 130k/ year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a patient safety matter.The GMC advice that it is a doctor's duty to raise concerns when they believe that patient safety is being compromised.

    http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/11864.asp

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say