This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

ePortfolio has become 'bureaucratic nightmare' for GP trainees, BMA warns

Exclusive The RCGP’s revamped ePortfolio is causing a ‘bureaucratic nightmare’ for trainees and trainers with data going missing and incorrect information being shown, says the BMA.

The RCGP introduced a new system last month, but the BMA says that it has resulted in trainees battling disruption and ‘box-ticking’ rather than gaining valuable training experience.

The reported problems include data going missing, including trainees’ national training numbers, and trainees and trainers having to back up everything they input.

Pulse has learnt that the BMA has written to the college to express its concern, and asked for urgent clarification on when the problems will be resolved.

The college itself admitted there was some ‘short-term disruption’, but that it anticipated the problems would be fully resolved by mid-October.

The ePortfolio is meant to act as a record of the evidence collected through workplace based assessments (WPBA), and the latest version was meant to be more ‘user friendly’.

But since the new system was introduced at the beginning of August, it has been beset with problems. In a list of glitches published on the RCGP website, it says ‘a minority of trainees may not be able to locate some records. All historical records have been backed up and these will be restored in due course’.

It also found that trainees are ‘missing national training numbers [which are used to identify trainees]. Some trainees’ details are not being imported as expected from another database.’ Other problems include incorrect data being shown, correct codes being rejected and a range of minor glitches.

This is not the first time there has been controversy surrounding the implementation of a new version of the ePortfolio. In January 2011, Pulse reported repeated problems with the website, which resulted in trainees losing work and suffering delays in completing their assessments online.

The letter from the BMA, signed by Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, chair of the GP trainees subcommittee, said all new systems had ‘teething problems’ but added that the ‘extent of the disruption was considerable’ and questioned the testing of the system.

It added: ‘Although the RCGP has been providing updates to trainees and trainers periodically, this has not served to reassure those affected sufficiently. It may help to alleviate trainees’ concerns if the RCGP were to make a detailed public statement, not only updating trainees on progress, but providing some idea of the potential knock-on effects of the ePortfolio problems and how they will be managed. I think this communication is now a matter of urgency.’

Dr Kasaraneni told Pulse: ‘What is meant to be an electronic record of training is fast turning into a bureaucratic nightmare with more and more boxes that need ticking on an electronic platform that doesn’t work. Trainees are having to spend more time on the new version compared to the old one to work around these problems.’

He added: ‘We have to spend time redoing the same things rather than learning meaningful things about general practice.’

Dr Tom Black, chair of the Northern Ireland GPC, said the bureaucracy involved had an ‘opportunity cost’, taking trainers and trainees away from real training.

He said: ‘Every time they change it, it becomes more bureaucratic, with more layers, more boxes to tick and more difficult to navigate around. It pretends to be training, but it is a bureaucratic nightmare.’

Dr Kamal Sidhu, a GP trainer in County Durham, said that the update needed to be ‘better planned’. He said: ‘We had trainees complaining of losing saved data and this caused a lot of inconvenience, but on a positive note, we were given regular updates on these issues through our training schemes.’

A statement from the RCGP said the problems were expected from a completely new system that had involved the migration of millions of items of information.

She said: ‘With projects of this scale, there is inevitably some risk of short term disruption to users but we share the concerns of trainees and trainers who have been affected and are doing all we can to sort out the final outstanding issues.

She added that it anticipated the problems would be fully resolved by mid-October. ‘[We] hope that the overall benefits of the new system will soon outweigh any current disruption. We thank our trainees and trainers for their patience and for bearing with us in the meantime.’

Readers' comments (17)

  • Typical! RCGP is noted to rush in making decisions without doing it's homework properly. The change in CSA marking scheme is another example, due to defend this in court. RCGP please learn from other Royal colleges.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Saving log entries is a nightmare, I tried 3-4 times and every time lost my log entry so I have not tried again I am writing my log entries in word documents and will cut and paste later on when these issues are resolved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I went through the first year of the eportfolio and the whole thing was a basket case then with similar issues as described above. We couldn't believe what we were being asked to do when we first clapped eyes on it. Clearly nothing has changed!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Starve the beast.

    Leave the RCGP when you qualify.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couldn't believe they planned all this to happen in early August just when new trainees were starting! Surely a plan for chaos? Makes me wonder if the decision makers have any connection with those on the ground..

    Part of the problem is that the eportfolio isn't great to start with (hopefully it's secure?) In the past I have spent hours unpicking various muddles and losing valuable work. I would advise re-validating GPs not to go anywhere near it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Applies to GP land everywhere. I do not mind working hard, but working hard doing absolute rubbish, of no use to man or beast or even to the managers who think up this utter trash like co - morbidity forms.
    What a terrible, terrible world General Practice has become.
    Einstein did not work in the NHS and it is easy to see !!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a trainer and educational supervisor I feel like an unpaid beta tester for the RCGP. Carrying out educational supervision with a registrar this week took me 3x as long to prepare for and I have the dubious pleasure of writing the review up this weekend in the dreaded e-portfolio following our meeting yesterday. I know registrars and other trainers are feeling pee'd off with the rcgp at present.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I took VER this year way before I could have retired and am so pleased I did. Even better I am very proud of the fact that in my career I didn't pay a single penny to the bunch of jokers called the RCGP. Why not all resign from it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is yet another example of the RCGP abusing its power. Realistically we have no option but to use the RCGP's ePortfolio. The question is why does the College think it is a competent IT developer? Leave taks like this to professional software houses for whom this is their core business.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Trainees, It gets no better once you have got your MRCGP. The ePortfolio for practising GPs was a waste of space too. I resigned from the College because it was a waste of £500 per year (you are still invited to attend all College events) and use a much better ePortfolio provided locally for free.

    The RCGP is out of touch with the profession, doesn't really give a damn about patients and is abused by the elected GPs to further their political careers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say