Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Patients feel better cared for at GP training practices

Patients registered at GP training practices consistently reported more positive experiences of GP care than did patients at non-training practices, according to findings from the GP Patient Survey 2012.

The patients at GP training practices rated their GPs more highly on all aspects of the ‘doctor care domain’, which include areas such as time given to patients, the doctor’s listening and communication skills, involving patients in their own care and patients’ confidence and trust.

Patients at GP training practices also reported better ‘overall satisfaction’ with their care than patients at non-training practices – with higher ratings for ‘overall experience’ and ‘recommending GP surgery to someone who has just moved to the area’.

The findings, published in this month’s British Journal of General Practice, come from a study of 2011/2012 GP Patient Survey data for 7,886 practices, of which 2,288 (29%) were GP training practices.

Patients registered with training practices rated the ‘doctor care domain’ questions between 0.68% and 1.11% higher than did patients at non-training practices; they rated the ‘overall satisfaction’ questions 1.52% to 1.98% higher.

In contrast, the training status of practices did not influence how patients rated nurse care or out-of-hours services.

The authors concluded: ‘Based on GP Patient Survey responses, doctors in GP training practices appeared to offer more patient-centred care with patients reporting more positively concerning attributes of doctors such as “listening” or “care and concern”.’

Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, chair of the GPC GP trainees subcommittee, said the findings ‘come as no surprise’.

He said: ‘The reasons are two fold. GP training is indeed a time and financial drain for GP practices. Practices can only afford to take on training once they are fully staffed and appropriately resourced. And if the practices are fully staffed and funded appropriately, then it will naturally translate into a better patient experience.’

‘GP trainees through their training placements constantly interact with their trainers and get involved in many educational events at their practice. There is also an element of peer supported learning which gives trainees the opportunities to share their experiences of positive patient care which then spread from one practice to another.’

He added: ‘This paper did look at a large data set and it adds a great deal to our position on the matter - fund general practice better, promote the workforce of today and tomorrow - and the patients will be the winners. I hope the DH take evidence like this on board when considering the recommendations of the Shape of Training Review to increase funding for general practice training.’

Br J Gen Pr 2014; available online 1 March

Readers' comments (3)

  • Wow, it's lucky that the Dept of Health are doing so much to facilitate GP training. Like not introducing charges for training....oh wait...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It takes a lot to maintain a training practice with more than one GP trainees.We have two trainers and they have to spend sessional time to provide tutorials , filling up pro-folio and also time away for trainer training . Rest of us then have to cross cover . Not easy at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Around here they dont. It doesnt say but I presume those results are statistically significant. I also wonder how much of the higher rating score is down to the partners and how much due to those enthusiastic new docs with extra long apts

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say