Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

RCGP reviewing whether MRCGP exam is ‘fit for purpose’

Exclusive The RCGP has drafted in consultants to carry out a ‘comprehensive review’ of its controversial MRCGP exam, which will look at whether the assessment is ‘fit for purpose’.

It is also looking at whether ‘fairness to candidates’ is sufficiently considered at ‘all stages of test design and delivery’, following controversy around the gap in pass rates between white and BME candidates.

The college said that it is undertaking the review now because the exam has been running for 10 years and is ‘therefore at an appropriate point at which to evaluate its content and structure’.

It is also ensuring that the exam is in line with the GMC’s revised standards for postgraduate curricula, published in May.

The Health Professional Assessment Consultancy has been appointed is to review the MRCGP assessment – including the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT), the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) and the Workplace Based Assessment (WPBA) - and suggest potential changes.

According to a paper presented at this month’s RCGP council meeting, the review is expected to include answers to the following questions:

  • Is the current programme of assessment fit for the purpose of a postgraduate medical license?
  • Are there emerging evidence-based assessment methodologies that the RCGP should consider to ensure that the MRCGP remains fit for purpose and adaptable?
  • Does the programme of assessment meet the requirements of the GMC’s Standards for Curriculum and Assessment Review, including the proposed General Professional Competences?
  • Is fairness to candidates sufficiently considered at all stages of test design and delivery?
  • Are the current standards appropriate to ensure patient safety?
  • What enhancements to test development, standard setting and quality assurance methodologies might be appropriate?

The MRCGP has come under fire in the past on a number of issues. In 2015, Pulse reported that the BMA had concerns over perceived high fees.

Meanwhile GP leaders have previously called on the RCGP to look at reforming the training process, with former college chair Professor Clare Gerada questioning the necessity of the CSA aspect of the exam.

And the exam has been the subject of a long-running dispute about the differences in failure rates between UK white and BME graduates and international medical graduates, which sparked a judicial review hearing instigated by the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) in 2014.

The review ruled that the exam was lawful but the judge stressed that the RCGP needed to ‘eliminate discrimination’ in the MRCGP and tackle the differences in failure rates between white and non-white medical graduates sitting the CSA.

 

 

Readers' comments (37)

  • Cobblers

    It would be better if the review was

    "If the RCGP is fit for purpose".

    COI am not and never was a RCGP doctor. I had the option of taking the exam but at that time it was not a de facto pass requirement for GP Training.

    I did not like what I saw in the early 1980s. I like it even less now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP is suffering with a massive case of unconscious bias.

    CSA is easy to pass if you stick a hot potato in your mouth.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • What purpose?
    Is it to demonstrate a knowledge of academic papers, and thought, in relation to the field of primary care
    or
    Is it to validate the ability to diagnose,run a practice,and hit sufficient targets to maintain financial viability
    Bear in mind all CSA consultations are by definition incompetent, since no record of any is ever made.The MDU would decline to defend any consultation along CSA lines, if it were with a real patient

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It isn't. Go back to summative assessment and MRCGP if people want to bother. This was all about RCGP taking control.

    DOI: MRCGP(2008) no longer a member as it delivers little of benefit I can see.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Much that I do not think the MRCGP is fit for purpose. I can't help but feel the GMC being involved brings in a political element where they will try to water down standards to allow non medics to attempt college exams.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jo Smit, you may have a point there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • agree, not fit for purpose. huge subconscious bias in CSA

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You pass CSA if you know to 'act' and prepare to fail if you apply some sense as you do in normal practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting development and an indicator that the 'college' knew that thair CSA exam stank all along. (And no I'm not an IMG who wants justice for being taken for a ride and having my life ruined by these cowboys).

    Rather than being obsessed with being in London, if the RCGP relocated to a more sensible accessible location like the midlands they wouldn't have to pay such a huge mortgage on their prestige building? Then perhaps exam fees could come down and the feeling that the RCGP exploits its trainees, is self serving and doesn't give two hoots about its members or having hugely expensive dysfunctional exams which aren't fit for purpose in the first place,might change.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with Jo Smit - I have concerns about the MRCGP and particularly allegations of subconscious bias (DOI - I'm white and I passed it) but I also feel that at a time where the traditional GP role is being taken on by other clinicians (nurses, PAs) that we should be ensuring that a newly trained and qualified GP is at a sufficiently high standard to justify that role and salary.
    I would have concerns about moving back to a purely workplace based assessment system, as it is too easy for struggling trainees to be pushed through as "that's the easy thing to do". This will only become a bigger problem as our workload increases and intensifies as we will have less capcity (time, mental etc) to tackle the difficult trainees.

    Also as private providers increase their foothold in GP I wonder whether they will also take on any roles in training, and I would imagine that in that environment this could be an issue as well.

    I'm glad they're looking at it at the very least but I worry that the pendulum may swing too far in the other direction.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say