Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

What is the truth about the MRCGP?

The RCGP is being asked to justify the income it makes from GP trainees, finds Alex Matthews-King

RCGP exam entrance

The cost of the MRCGP exam is a major issue for GP trainees and the RCGP has struggled to justify its fees after recently being challenged on the issue.

Currently, trainees pay £530 for each attempt at the applied knowledge test (AKT) and £1,780 for the clinical skills assessment (CSA), with small discounts for college membership.

But the fees are high compared with other colleges’ entrance exams and a Pulse analysis of the RCGP’s official accounts has raised questions about the net income of £10m from the exam it has declared over the past five years.

The BMA has also voiced concerns about the rising costs of the exam and the lack of transparency around the income generated by the college, saying ‘GP trainees need to have confidence they are getting value for money’.

GPC trainee subcommittee chair Dr Donna Tooth confirmed the BMA had ‘repeatedly attempted’ to get an explanation about how the MRCGP fees are calculated, to no avail.

After Pulse published its analysis, the RCGP responded robustly, claiming the MRCGP was ‘cost neutral’ overall and that not all expenses related to the exam were recorded in the official accounts.

Honorary treasurer Dr Helen Stokes-Lampard said: ‘The figures only indicate the obvious costs of examinations and do not take into account the considerable overheads involved with running a professional licensing examination, such as the MRCGP assessment.

‘The exam is cost neutral in that any income generated is wholly spent on costs associated with essential aspects of the delivering the MRCGP, without which it could not adequately function or develop in line with ongoing reviews of systems and adherence to evolving GMC requirements.’

But the reality of the situation is more complicated. The college later gave figures to Pulse showing it had actually made a loss from the MRCGP over the past five years, although this included new unaudited data from 2014/15.

The new figures show that from 2010 to 2014, the college made a small surplus of £527,000 from the exam, but this was wiped out by a £1.3m loss in 2014/15, due to a fall in candidate numbers.

However, the 2014/15 accounts have yet to be approved by the college’s trustee board or auditors, so they cannot be shared in full, and the RCGP has – despite several requests from Pulse – yet to explain the ‘considerable overheads’ that do not appear in the official accounts.

The college said it was ‘difficult to provide a meaningful or accurate explanation without sharing confidential information, such as that about salaries or staffing arrangements, and, in some cases, commercially sensitive data’.

But Pulse has obtained a report from 2011 that did reveal the full costs of the exam, including an expense of £67 per candidate for ‘catering and other costs’, £165 per candidate towards wages, travel and training expenses for CSA actors, and £478 to backfill examiners for leaving their practices and cover their ‘travel and subsistence costs’.

These costs are four years old and many – such as rent for examinations space – are likely to have changed as the RCGP’s new headquarters has a purpose-built exam suite. But MRCGP fees are high compared with comparable exams; for instance the MRCS costs £1,415 and the MRCPsych a total of £1,645.

Discussions between the RCGP and the BMA on the issue are ongoing, and GP trainees saving for their exam fees will be interested in the outcome.

GP trainer view – ‘The cost is a huge issue’

kamal-sidhu

Most trainees are very anxious about the MRCGP, especially the clinical skills assessment, and the examination fees play a big role in creating that anxiety.

Exam costs are a huge issue for all trainees and even more so for those who have needed multiple sittings.

With the MRCGP being an exit examination, there is no scope for trainees to spread this cost over training years. I have yet to come across a trainee who feels that the examination costs are justified.

Recent controversy and the evidence published in Pulse have created even more uncertainty. I think there needs to be more clarity on why the examination fees need to be so high. It will only help us understand the college’s position.

We need not only to attract more doctors into general practice but retain more trainees, and part of that has to be reasonable exam fees, especially as one cannot practice without membership.

I hope the college will be able to contain and curtail the fees by bringing in efficiency savings.

Dr Kamal Sidhu is a trainer in County Durham

Rate this article  (4.45 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (23)

  • How can you be forced to do and pay for the MRCGP then for the alien college to say if you don't pay annually you can't use your earned degree letters.
    Dumb.
    They make a lot from the ceremony too!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    The trainees are always the 'weaker' party compared to RCGP which is the establishment with its authority :


    If there is a hard, high wall and an egg that breaks against it, no matter how right the wall or how wrong the egg, I will stand on the side of the egg. Why? Because each of us is an egg, a unique soul enclosed in a fragile egg. Each of us is confronting a high wall. The high wall is the system which forces us to do the things we would not ordinarily see fit to do as individuals . . . We are all human beings, individuals, fragile eggs. We have no hope against the wall: it's too high, too dark, too cold. To fight the wall, we must join our souls together for warmth, strength. We must not let the system control us -- create who we are. It is we who created the system. (Jerusalem Prize acceptance speech, JERUSALEM POST, Feb. 15, 2009)
    Haruki Murakami

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP trainer view- could have been written by my cat

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its OK to expect high standards and charge big bucks for exams but here is the catch...the RCGP provides no proper training for the trainers who in turn provide little or no training for the trainees. In other words the RCGP is delusional and a thief. Not paying you no more :p

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This organisation needs exposing for what it is.
    A Mickey Mouse royal college which has a monopoly on an overpriced and irrelevant exit exam.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been deleted by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP could introduce buy one and get one free offer for the AKT and CSA examinations.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • .the RCGP provides no proper training for the trainers

    what region were you in, trainers in most deaneries have a lot of training...

    I agree with the critique of the exam and educationalists, but I have met many outstanding trainers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP - cash cow.

    At least you got the old RCGP appraisal tool-kit thrown in for free, No but wait they sold out and now you will have to pay for the privilege in future years.

    You used to get the MSF and PSQ done and analysed for free via the tool-kit - now yo need to pay extra money for that service also.

    So sorry - what exactly are they doing with all the millions of fees and subscriptions?

    Exactly what does membership pay for ? - high wages for prima Donna GPs pretending to represent Primary Care - actually lining their nests for future political positions and new years honours.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @1:17 practice manager

    I agree entirely. I actually used to be quite proud when I gained my MRCGP qualification in 2008. I felt it was recognition of my hard work and dedication and it made me feel like I'd "made it". A sign of recognition if you like.

    However since them I've been disgusted with various scandals that have hit the college and various press releases they have made. I've also been keeping a close eye on some of the old guard that used to run this outfit and what they are up to and I've certainly not been impressed. It's made me realise that this organization really are a bunch of self important toffs, who believe it is their god given right to control the rest of us. They are so far removed from day to day general practice it's seems like they are a bunch of archaic old cronies pontificating what life is like for us younger generation without ever spoken to those they make generalizations about.

    Anyway to cut a long story short I've moved abroad and got my qualifications for my new jurisdiction and by the way this year will be the first year I REFUSE to pay the exorbitant £400 odd pounds fee and YET I certainly will not abrogate my qualification!! YES I SHALL STILL USE MY MRCGP QUALIFICATION WITH PRIDE BECAUSE BY GEORGE IVE CERTAINLY PAID OVER THE ODDS FOR IT OVER THE YEARS........the RCGP hadn't had the stomach to fight for us all these years, let's see of it has the stomach to fight against us if we choose to keep it's letters after our name!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say