Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Complaints rise against GPs for 'ticking the wrong boxes'

GPs are at risk of facing potential negligence claims by ticking the wrong box on patient assessment forms, the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland has found.

The MDDUS has seen an increase in calls from its members facing patient complaints due to errors filling out assessment forms – with HGV licence applications proving to be the most problematic due to changes in the format.

The defence union found that 10% of communication error complaints against GPs made to the GMC involved a doctor error on an assessment form.

Risk adviser Alan Frame added: ‘We have had cases resulting in claims simply because a doctor ticked the wrong box or missed out important information on a form. There is always a risk of human error – especially when resources are stretched. Our experience tells us that even routine tasks in a busy practice can have consequences for doctors.

‘Lapses in concentration and poor attention to detail can have a serious effect on quality and safety. The chance of a simple error occurring increases when undertaking tasks that may be repetitive and routine in nature.’

The GMC’s current Good Medical Practice guidance states: ‘You must make sure that any documents you write or sign are not false or misleading. You must take reasonable steps to check the information is correct.’

Last year, figures from MDDUS revealed a rise in the number of claims made against GPs in 2012, despite claims against hospital doctors decreasing.

 

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • The problem with average list size. Ever increasing workloads for the same money and the chance of making more and more mistakes. Workload is going to rise inexorably without let up year on year. It actually amazes me that MDU covers any amount of workload for doctors, such as 80 hour weekends for A+E consultants.
    GPs could see 45 + patients during the day and then go on OOH provider and see another 25 - somedays more than 70 patients.
    If the MDU / MPS started defining safety levels in hours worked and patients seen, both doctors and patients would be safer.
    In many countries such definitions do exist. Why MDU do you allow unfettered, unregulated hours, I wonder?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say