Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

'Good Samaritan' bill could give doctors more protection, says the MDU

GPs who act as ‘good Samaritans’ by helping in emergency situations could be provided with extra protection by a new bill going through Parliament, a medical defence body has said.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill - announced in the Queen’s Speech - would mean judges would take into account whether an individual was intervening in an emergency to assist someone in danger when deciding whether they should be liable for causing an accident.

Dr Richenda Tisdale, a medico-legal adviser with the Medical Defence Union, said the new bill could provide doctors with ‘additional reassurance as it could protect them from being sued.’

She said: ‘Doctors have an ethical duty to give what assistance they can in an emergency outside their work.  It’s unusual, if not unheard of, for Good Samaritan acts by doctors to result in legal action. We haven’t heard of it in the UK, but it is something that concerns our members and so we have made arrangements so they could seek our help if they were sued here or abroad. The new bill is welcome as if it became law, it could provide additional reassurance as it could protect them from being sued here.’

A previous Medical Defence Union survey of GPs, GP trainees and hospital doctors showed that just under 40% of the 127 respondents had helped out in an emergency as good Samaritans between two and three times, while 13% had assisted more than five times.

The MDU regularly advises its members about their legal position when they have stepped in to help in an emergency, the union said.

Readers' comments (1)

  • looks like the MDU will have to spend time thinking of new and creative justification for charging additional premiums? I was reviewing referrals no interventions resulted, MDU wanted £1500 on earnings off £5k max, other defence unions- zero.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say