Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Hundreds of GPs approach new 'lower cost' indemnity provider

Hundreds of GPs are considering joining a new medical negligence indemnity scheme that has promised to slash fees.

The start-up Medical Defense Society has handled more than 200 enquiries since its launch last month, in addition to 70 applications.

The MDS is the first new indemnity service in a century and was set up by a group of GPs, alongside lawyers and medico-defence experts.

The GP-exclusive indemnity provider says it wants to ‘help members reduce risk and respond efficiently to any professional difficulties that arise’.

Rohan Simon, the CEO of the fledgling not-for-profit told Pulse that by limiting membership to GPs the MDS could ‘give them a more competitive deal as we don’t have the increased size and frequency and size of claims compared to our secondary care colleagues.’

Mr Simon said: ‘Overall it has been a positive response. We currently have over 70 members with more applications in the pipeline. We are continuing to work hard on building trust, relationships and making a difference. Feedback from members so far has been very positive and encouraging.'

'Overall, whilst we are pleased with the growth in our membership our main priority will be careful financial and risk management to ensure the long term success of MDS. We are very happy with how things are going. Things are progressing well. I think the response is really encouraging - with a bit of competition in the market.’

The launch came as medical defence organisations are preparing to increase their costs due to the Government's reduction to the discount rate, leading immediately to higher claims payouts in the case of lifetime compensation awards.

But the Department of Health pledged earlier this month that it would protect GPs from any hikes by increasing existing reimbursement to practices.

NHS England, the DH, the GPC and the three existing MDOs also remain in discussion about how the cost of GP indemnity can be stemmed in the longer term, by reducing the number of claims as well as their cost.

This includes the DH consultation into capping recoverable costs in criminal negligence cases, results of which are still being analysed despite closing in May.

Solving the indemnity cost problem

New GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey has warned that working as a GP would become 'untenable' for many as MDOs were expected to raise fees this autumn and many GPs have already reduced their sessions due to soaring legal costs.

Ministers in England made a two-year commitment to bear the cost of any indemnity cover increases for GPs and have indicated this will continue past 2019.

LMC representatives voted in May for GPC to negotiate full reimbursement of indemnity costs for GPs and for any future reimbursement scheme to target individual GPs directly.

Although the push for a long-term solution is taking its time to materialise, the GPC has said that ‘everything is on the table’ in their discussions with the Government, including a state-funded scheme.

Readers' comments (6)

  • How much matey?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 10 magical beans, as Jack said.....😏

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Have you noticed that they have misspelt "Defense"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Just a lateral thinking , Helen .
    Richard said working as a GP would be untenable because of the situation of indemnity.
    Is that classified as negativity ?(presumably there are some GP trainees would have read his comment )

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I left full time practice 8 years ago after 30 odd years without a legal claim. I have now received two negligence claims in the past 6 months that both related to my time as a partner. I was very grateful for the prompt help of my indemnifier.

    I think that medicolegal risk is NOT an area in which I would like to try and save money and then find myself backed up by a very small pool of cash and expertease.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Those of us with long memories may remember the last attempt to set up an independent defence organisation.

    ISTR that it ended badly and that at the end GOS were queuing at the doors of MDU/MPS to rejoin!

    GPs are a high risk group, so the newcomer will need deep pockets!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say