This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Our SMS templates helped save 40 follow-up appointments per week

Dr Muhammed Akunjee and Dr Nazmul Akunjee discuss their system texting patients about their test results

sms

 

The problem

An audit of our pathology links in a typical week showed we usually had around 600 blood tests. We also looked at scan requests and found the week’s workload was 25 MRI, 40 X-ray and 25 ultrasound reports.

Around 20% of pathology and scans were found to be abnormal and requiring action. We estimated this meant around 120 patients a week would have to be contacted by telephone or letter. Of these, 80 would be called back to the GP.

The typical process would be for the doctor to identify potentially abnormal results and then for admin staff to ask the patient to attend. Those with urgent results would be contacted first.

Once a patient attended an appointment, one of four possibilities would arise:

• The results were normal and the patient could be reassured.

• The results were abnormal and the patient would require a repeat test, scan or additional tests.

• The results were abnormal and the patient would require a prescription.

• The results were abnormal and the patient would require referral or admission.

We felt there was a great opportunity to save appointments by creating a program that would allow the doctor to perform the above four actions using SMS texting, without having to see the patient face to face.

What we did

Our clinical team assessed the different outcomes for a wide variety of abnormal tests and scan results and created the following clinical templates:

• Twenty pathology results, including low ferritin, raised cholesterol, low vitamin D, abnormal K, abnormal Na, abnormal LFTs, stool Helicobacter pylori, urine – UTI, swab – thrush, HbA1c, TFTs and eGFR.

• Twenty scan results including PCOS, ovarian cyst, fatty liver, gallstones, fibroids, sciatica, inguinal hernia, bursitis, rotator cuff tear, varicoceles, hydroceles, ganglions, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and meniscal tears.

We spent two months reviewing the above areas and designing templates that allowed the clinician to create an SMS message that would inform the patient of their condition and the next steps. The templates included fields that allow the clinician to communicate the actual results, explain what they mean, provide links to online patient information leaflets, tell the patient whether they need a script and advise on the need for further or repeat tests, onward referrals or review at the surgery.

We then commissioned a team of programmers to build the software. The software also allows us to automatically email password-protected blood test request forms and e-referral forms.

Each week, about 120 patients had to be contacted about test and scan results

The results

The practice has reduced the need for GP appointments by 40 a week, or 2,000 in a year. This adds up to 6.5 hours of clinical time a week – equivalent to at least £20,000 of locum expenditure per year. Opening up our access by working proactively means we have reduced our wait for a prebooked routine appointment to less than one week.

We have also made savings on stationery, postage stamps and printer costs, as well as freeing admin and other staff from recalling and chasing patients.

Our staff are much happier with the new process, as the documentation is automatically sent to the patient and patients do not have to come back to the surgery for results. In addition, staff no longer receive requests for test results because of lost emails or letters.

The challenges

We spent our own time and money to develop the solution as we felt it would bring significant savings. It was a new experience project-managing the development of a piece of software and ensuring we got the system we required and that it worked the way we wanted. The software itself is quite simple, and we have trained all our reception staff to use it.

The future

We were invited by the local CCG to present our findings to fellow GPs. We were also contacted by the local federation to consider testing in a cohort of five practices. If this is successful, the system will be rolled out to the remaining surgeries in NHS Haringey CCG.

Dr Muhammed Akunjee and Dr Nazmul Akunjee are GP partners in north London

Rate this article  (3.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (2)

  • already given up hope NI GP

    we never phone patients re results except under exceptional circumstances which is very rare.This would be an occasional abnormal result that required immediate action,most can wait
    When a patient has bloods/test arranged we explain that its their responsibilty to follow up that test.The patient only has to worry about themselves and it gives them a proper sense of ownership. With your system we would be required to worry about every test carried out which is not practical
    Others may disagree re governance ect but we couldnt function with this system

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How big is the patient list?

    Twenty-five MRI scans per week? I guess the answer to my question above is needed to put this into some kind of perspective.

    Has the follow-up pathway for abnormal results been reviewed by any group other than the CCG? Unless the history taking (and often, the examination) are very robust at the time the test is deemed needed, the result could have multiple and varying implications. The ferritin springs to mind here.

    On the face of it the scheme has some merits but also runs the risk of institutionalising poor practice, devoid of individualised patient-centred thought.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say