Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Junior doctors to be balloted on industrial action

Junior doctors are going to ballot on possible industrial action over the imposition of a contract which they say are unfair to doctors and could endanger patient safety, but the Government has claimed that GP trainees’ pay will not go down. 

The BMA’s junior doctors committee (JDC) took the decision to ballot members at its meeting on Saturday, with more details to be released over the coming weeks.

It comes as the Government categorically stated that the pay of GP trainees will not go down, and that the new supplement for GP registrars will be ‘almost identical to the system that already operates’.

The new chair of the JDC, Johann Malawana, said that the Government had ’chosen to ride roughshod over the concerns of doctors with their threat of imposition’.

He added: ’Today’s decision is a reflection of the anger felt by the thousands of junior doctors who have told us that the Government’s position is not acceptable.’

However, NHS Employers has said that GP trainees’ pay will not be affected by the changes.

In the clearest indication about GP trainee pay yet, NHS Employers said that the current supplement for GP trainees will be replaced by a ‘pay premia’ that would be targeted at shortage specialties as determined by Health Education England.

However, junior doctor leaders warned that the flexibility of the new premium means that there will be scope to reduce GP trainees’ pay depending on circumstances.

The Government last week announced that it would remove the supplement for GP trainees that equalises their pay to that of hospital junior doctors.

As the current contract stands, GP registrars receive a supplement because they work fewer hours and less out-of-hours than hospital trainees, meaning their banding and pay would be much lower without the supplement.

NHS Employers say this is this is effectively a recruitment and retention payment, to ensure that training as a GP is not financially less attractive than training in a hospital specialty.

The GP Survival group warned last week that the removal of the supplement would see GP trainee pay decrease by 31%.

In its response, the Government said it was going to replace the supplement with the pay premia, but both the BMA and the RCGP called for more clarity about what form this will take.

Following questioning by Pulse, an NHS Employers spokesperson said: ‘We have no intention of reducing GP pay. GP registrar earnings will not go down as a result of the proposed new arrangements.

‘The proposed new system would be almost identical to the system that already operates for GP trainees, except that this type of pay supplement - a flexible pay premia – could now also be paid to doctors in other shortage specialties, as well as GPs.

‘What’s more, rather than being determined solely by DDRB and the government, Health Education England would be asked to make recommendations about the supplement using its workforce expertise, so that it would be more sensitive to recruitment and retention issues, not less.’

But Dr Andrew Collier, former co-chair of the BMA’s junior doctors committee, told Pulse: ‘The concerns that we would have about the shift from the current supplement to flexible pay premia is that the flexible pay premia could be at risk at future funding reviews.

‘Trainees need a degree of certainty when choosing a specialty like general practice, but this is simply not going to be available in the new system.’

Readers' comments (27)

  • 'almost identical'...says it all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it ain't broke don't fix it. Very fishy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The pay premia sound more like our QoF 'premia. Don't trust this gov and walk away while you can. Don't be held to ransom by a bunch of unscrupulous leaders and slave drivers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unless this is a new word, surely it is a pay premium, the plural of which is premia!!
    We seem to be back to the old illiteracy of consortium/consortia!
    If this is a direct quote from Dr Collier (shame on him) then you should publish ..."the flexible pay premia(sic)"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am sorry, but these people have zero credibility these days. If there wasn't money to be saved, why bother changing? I'll bet my right nut this doesn't turn out well. Twelve ST2 GP trainees in a room with me yesterday; 8 plan to emigrate, 2 retraining (Psychiatry and occupational medicine), one married to a consultant surgeon planning "perpetual pregnancy" and one, just one, said "I will probably locum for a few years till things settle down" (he is a 44 yr old former pharmacist who retrained). I think I'll give up this trainer thing, it's hard to deal with the withering realism of these sadly defeated people.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • year 0 - application. sign up to a =45% banding, buy a house.
    year 1+ - funding removed overnight. default on mortgage = homeless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sly Slimey I could go on....gives them the flexibility to shaft where and when they want!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the key is in the word "almost".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Warning to all medical students and foundation year doctors. DO NOT do general practice. The future of the profession will always be uncertain and unstable. Do not fall for temporary incentives. You will regret it when it's too late!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The trainees must be so relieved their pay is staying the same!! Lucky them!! I'm sure they'll be forever in debt to Lord Hunt for being so generous. Don't mention the countless pay freezes/below inflation rises, which means their pay is significantly less than it was 7 years ago.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.