Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

DDRB reviews of GP pay 'to continue'

Exclusive GPs are likely to continue having annual independent assessments of their funding, after NHS England said that it ‘anticipates’ taking into account recommendations from the doctors’ pay review body when recommending contract funding increases from April.

NHS England - previously known as the NHS Commissioning Board - said it would ‘want to seek agreement’ on contract changes in future, but reserved the right to resort to the type of consultation exercise that led to this year’s contract imposition.

The confirmation from NHS England comes despite the Department of Health’s rejection of the body’s recommendation that GPs should get a 2.29% uplift in 2013/14 to cover rising expenses.

The GPC said that it was unlikely to make any difference to the deal that GPs should expect in future years.

NHS England will assume the role of contract holder from the Department of Health from April, and will continue to use NHS Employers as its negotiating party with the GPC.

A spokesperson said: ‘We anticipate that the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration will continue to make recommendations as it does now on GP pay.

‘[NHS England] will want to take those recommendations into account in making decisions on future contract uplift.

‘[NHS England] would want to seek agreement, where possible, to any changes to the contract. If agreement could not be reached, any changes to the contract would - as now - be subject to consultation.’

GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman welcomed the commitment to continue using the DDRB, which he said is crucial for the profession to receive a fair pay review.

He said: ‘The point of the process is that it is an independent assessment of our worth. That is something I would insist on. This way we know who did it, we know where the body is and we know that the Government did it. Everybody knows that the Government interfered with the DDRB.’

But he said that he did not think NHS England would be ‘any more reasonable’ than the DH.

‘No,’ he said. ‘Because the mandates will still be set by the Government.’

Pulse Live: 30 April - 1 May, Birmingham

Pulse Live

You can find out more about how to protect your earnings at Pulse Live, Pulse’s new two-day annual conference for GPs, practice managers and primary care managers. Richard Apps, partner at RSM Tenon, will be presenting a session on how to maximise your practice income and keep an eye on your cash flow.

Pulse Live offers practical advice on key clinical and practice business topics, as well as an opportunity to debate the future of the profession, and a top range of speakers includes NICE chair designate Professor David Haslam, GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey and the Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell MP, chair of the House of Commons health committee.

To find out more and book your place, please click here.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Can someone please remind me when the government last gave a toss what the pay review body suggested?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say