Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Dr Helen McArdle: 'I am taking less income than as a salaried GP five years ago'

Dr Helen McArdle says that the practice’s main priority is maintaining income due to an exponential rise in costs and workload

We have reduced partner drawings by 17% compared with 14 months ago, when we took an initial reduction. With all the other changes to funding we anticipate this may need to reduce further over the next year.

Cash flow problems means less than half drawings this month, but I have heard of other practices that have taken no drawings for a month. Full time, before tax, my drawings will be at most £59,000 for the year which is less income than I earned as a salaried GP over 5 years ago.

I am sure the mainstream media will manage to twist the story and I don’t really expect sympathy. A bigger issue than partner drawings is that 60% of NHS staff have been denied a 1% pay rise this year. It is a strange world we live in where unearned income from property ownership and inheritance is ok, high earners like footballers and billionaire entrepeneurs are lauded in the media and yet doctors and other NHS staff are now denigrated and insulted by the same media. 

I guess I know how hard we all worked and continue to work to deserve our income. It doesn’t help our cause that there are divisions, resentments and misunderstandings over pay, workload and conditions between partners, salaried and locum GPs (I have been all three and understand all perspectives), between primary and secondary care doctors, between doctors and nurses…I could go on. 

Our current priority is maintaining practice income. There has been such a rapid decline in practice income along with an exponential rise in costs and workload in the last five years. It feels deliberate. Many partners in the UK are taking early retirement or moving abroad. New trainees don’t want to take on partnerships. The remaining partners are really feeling the strain. We all need to stay well because if anyone leaves or goes off sick that strain intensifies.

Perhaps that is the intention - practices implode and private providers step in and take the helm. The workforce becomes salaried. Politicians need to understand that GPs as independent contractors are excellent value for money. If they want a privatised and/or entirely salaried service they are going to see costs rise enormously and energetic innovation fall.

Dr Helen McArdle is a GP partner in Cockermouth, Cumbria

Readers' comments (5)

  • Good luck.
    I think the BMA/GPC needs to start publishing take home pay per consultation and how that has become cheaper. I am 45yrs old and will give up partnership as soon as my children leave school as at least I can predict my income at the moment even if it is falling.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couldn't agree more - this is all a response to the "millionaire GP" headlines we saw after nGMS nearly 10 years ago. GPs have been on the back foot since then in the media. The problem is that the country won't realise what an amazing service GPs provide until it's gone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • sad to hear a full time gp earning less than £60 k. lot of gp's have more in pension.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If your income is falling like that is there ANY reason why you should be a partner?? In this case YOU are paying to provide health service to your registered punters. from a business point of veiw you and your partners should dissolve the practice and work as a salaried /locum. Patients will suffer?? TOUGH.Not your responsibility to provide adequate health cover.That job is of DoH.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps having 10 partners for 10000 patients might be something worth considering?
    Unless you have a weighted list size much in excess of this seems fairly obvious where your problems lie even if the majority of you are part time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say