Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Dr David Rooke: ‘We are trying to make primary care a happier place to work’

The chair of NHS Somerset CCG explains why he has agreed with NHS England that local practices can opt out of QOF

We have been listening to our practices and morale has been incredibly low – recruitment and retention are a nightmare. There are lots of high-quality practices that are not getting any responses to adverts for replacements – whether for partners or salaried GPs – and some 60% of GP registrars training in Somerset leave. Primary care is not sustainable in its current form.

Having talked to GPs and the LMC, we agreed with the local area team practices would switch off QOF reporting for the rest of this year. For the first three months this is to give practices “head space” to think about what changes we can make in primary care to make it fit the modern world and hit the agendas around long-term conditions, access and acute care, tackle some variation and deal with telehealth and personalised care planning.

Each practice will have the choice to opt for the new national arrangements from April, or sign up to the local plan. I don’t think we need all practices engaged, if a few are not we could still go ahead with it, provided the majority want to. But we would need a significant number – otherwise you would not be able to prove the value of this.

We will need to develop some quality metrics to demonstrate improvements in key areas, which will have to be agreed with practices and the area team, but those will not involve anything like the complexity of QOF. Otherwise it will involve implementation of services that may well be provided at locality rather than practice level.

This is a bottom up approach and ideas that receive practice support may include management of complex patients in nursing and residential homes, perhaps in coordination with secondary care colleagues and certainly with community care. And the possibility of having rapid response teams in primary care, so that if a paramedic is about to admit a patient, we can guarantee to have a clinician there to assess within 20 minutes  – which we would hope will deliver reductions in urgent admissions.

Placing GPs within the ambulance service to do some of that assessment is another possibility. We have done some pilots with a GP who is a rapid-reponse, urgent care specialist, doing assessments on 999 calls – he saw several patients who would otherwise be scooped up and admitted who he treated and enabled to stay at home.

QOF should not be the only funding going forward. We have a primary care collaboration fund from April and there is the possibility of shifting other money out of secondary care into community and primary care services.

So there are a lot more opportunities for practices to get engaged in the acute agenda and the preventative and long-term conditions work than they have previously had – and the funding to follow it.

QOF has definitely improved the quality of care. In Somerset we have largely high-quality care and the comparative data on the practice quality dashboard demonstrates that. And there is clearly some anxiety that if you switch off QOF it will all go backwards. But from our point of view it has become embedded in good clinical care and GPs are not going to stop doing the good quality care, the hope is this will give them more room to do more of the preventative and acute response work.

In terms of the concerns we have been getting back about diminishing the national negotiating position – we are really not trying to undermine that. We are trying to support ongoing negotiations because the pressure on primary care is immense.

We are trying to innovate and find new ways of working that make primary care a happier and more rewarding place to work and that should inform the next round of negotiations – we’re certainly not trying to undermine them. Right throughout the scheme we’ve been clear practices can revert to the national arrangements.

Hopefully the GPC will be able to pick up on the good bits of this and use that in their negotiations and gain the support of practices. I feel the GPC should support innovation in pilots like this that are aimed at making primary care a better place to work whilst delivering better care and use them as exemplars for the next round of negotiations. Our LMC has predicted there will be considerable concerns at the centre over the collective bargaining but we’re fairly confident we can sort that out in our agreements with the area team with the support of NHS England.

Dr David Rooke is chair of NHS Somerset CCG

Readers' comments (6)

  • Might move to Somerset!!
    Better than being treated like a stool.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • come let us all get rid off qof altogether

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps someone ( GPC, NHSE, pulse, Dept of health, local MPs, anyone really) should ask those of us who have walked out why we have done so, and why those who could take substantive posts don't want to.
    Not one of these " innovative" schemes would persuade me to go back. Having a reasonable workload with continuity for my own patients and some recognition from NHSE/ DoH that I am a human being just might.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a great idea...more of this kind of thing would be welcome

    7:55am - absolutely. I left last year now am just about getting by as a locum and hope to be doing something entirely different soon.

    I am SO glad I left. Every practice I go to is full of miserable Drs ' on the edge'. Nothing would persuade me to come back into the current system. With 9 years as a GP I had 25 years of potential GP service ahead of me to give before I am due to retire. NO WAY am I doing that!

    Anyone up there interested in where all the GPs are going and why?? I don't think so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We should be discussing the rise of anti-GPism and it's growing virulence. GPs are responsible for all of society's ills seemingly and this notion has spread from the right wing press to more mainstream press. GPs are greedy, lazy and scheming! Heard this tale before??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • agree with all the above ... except moving to Somerset. Things are not that bad (yet).

    basically they (society) don't give a monkey's about us as we are viewed as rich, lazy and easy scape goats. GP bashing helps to sell papers, get votes, gets some people promoted in the NHS (if you know what I mean), and generally makes a significant proportion of the public happy with themselves.

    we have reached the point that goodwill has all but gone and most people I know are making exit plans.
    So will the last GP please turn off the light?

    ps if anyone has any on becoming a private gp please post.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say