Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP practices set to ‘co-regulate’ themselves alongside the CQC

The CQC has said that it wants to move towards a new approach of ‘co-regulation’, which would prompt GP practices to provide evidence of their quality of care and face inspections less regularly as part of its new vision for inspections over the next five years.

The CQC’s ‘discussion paper’ published today, which outlines new regulatory proposals before a formal consultation next year, suggests practices which have been rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ will be inspected less frequently – as previously mooted by Professor Steve Field.

Instead, the ‘co-regulation’ approach will encourage all providers to ‘develop their own systems and processes’ – so they can understand quality of care themselves.

Practices that have been inspected once under its new approach would be expected to share evidence of the standards of care they are delivering, and report on any changes to the quality of care since their last inspection.

In addition to this, the regulator claims it wants to develop ‘Intelligent Monitoring’ of providers, adding that further improvement of its data will allow it to ‘trigger action’ where concerns are raised, and ’target inspection resources where the risks to the public are greatest.’

The overall discussion paper outlines the CQC’s strategy on how it plans to develop the way it regulates providers from 2016 to 2021, so it can adapt to the emergence of new models of care.

The less regular inspections would allow it to target resources better towards providers that are at higher risk of not providing quality of care, the CQC claims.

Proposals to essentially scale back inspections once all practices have been inspected by moving to a more ‘responsive and tailored inspection model’ comes after the regulator recently conceded that it is likely its Government funding could be cut by 40%.

CQC board papers last week revealed that the practicality of the regulator delivering the its planned inspection model for 2016/17 was dependent on the outcome of the Government’s Spending Review next month.

However, the CQC also warned that there would be ‘implications’ should it be asked by the Government to consider a 40% reduction in its central funding.

David Behan, chief executive of the CQC, said: ‘Our last strategy created a more rigorous inspection approach that gives providers and the people who use services a deeper insight into the quality and safety of care. This is crucial to help people using services make informed choices and so that providers know where they need to improve.

’Our next strategy will set out the case for developing our approach – building on the strong foundations we now have in place.’

The CQC’s new discussion paper states: ‘We could move towards an approach of co-regulation, which would mean CQC supporting providers to assess and share evidence on their own quality of care against each of our key questions.

’We could explore this further for providers who have already been through a comprehensive inspection under our new approach and who could, using detailed key lines of enquiry, report on any changes to the quality of care provided since their previous inspection.

‘Co-regulation could encourage providers to develop their own systems and processes for understanding quality, which we know is an essential step in developing a culture of continuous improvement. 

Following the publication of the CQC’s strategy paper today, it will publish a formal consultation on its proposals in January.

Readers' comments (10)

  • "Co-regulation could encourage providers to develop their own systems and processes for understanding quality, which we know is an essential step in developing a culture of continuous improvement"

    Now they want us to do THIR job for them??!! ROTFLMFAO

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "...Intelligent Monitoring..."

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    ha

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How much are they paying us to do this for them!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    That is all well and good, but is only one poster by my sink telling me how to wash my hands (21 years after enrolling at medical school) enough?

    Should we have two?

    I'm thinking of putting up a sign saying:

    "WARNING! This sign has sharp edges."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • this is sensible and practical

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Cautiously welcome( you see, I have learnt my ministerial language )
    Another message is basically,'we are skinned' because of 40% cut in budget. Does that mean somebody has to pay more???
    On the matter of intelligence , I can't help referring to what Tony Blair said recently,"I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong.......''Should Master Yoda say the same?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Say what you want about CQC, but you will miss it when it's gone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whilst it is very easy to sneer at the CQC there will be many GPs who also have had 21 years experience after medical school who are running practices that are sub standard and dangerous , denying that reality weakens your argument

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If they built a sensible infrastructure for the submission of training certificates for all staff, and a national policy library so much of this would have been much easier.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They have run out of money and their performance has been dire. The government is quietly pulling the plug.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.