Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Partners could lose control of practice following poor inspections under CQC proposals

Practices could be placed in ‘special measures’ if they perform poorly in their CQC inspections, which could mean partners have to answer to improvement directors or may lose some administrative powers, under a new scheme currently being developed by the CQC.

In hospitals the scheme can see boards stripped of decision making and administrative powers, but the details for how the scheme would be applied to GPs are still being developed.

The chief inspector of general practice, Professor Steve Field, has said that they have ‘started work’ on a system to tackle ‘inadequate GPs’ but that full details will not be available until later in the summer.

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt is expected to announce details of how the scheme will be applied to care homes tomorrow.

Professor Field said: ‘We have started work on a system for what we should do to tackle inadequate GP services. This work draws on the experience from our new-style GP inspections and the data we collect and analyse about services.’

‘We are working very closely with NHS England. GPs and the bodies that represent them such as the BMA  and RCGP, the GMC and people who use GP services will all be involved in this work. We will make an announcement about what GP special measures could look like later in the summer.’

GPC chair, Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that patients should be able to expect ‘consistent’ care standards, but that they shouldn’t be achieved through creating a ‘counterproductive blame culture’.

Dr Nagpaul said: ‘The overwhelming majority of the 8000 GP practices across England provide an excellent service to the nearly one million patients who walk through surgery doors on a daily basis.’

‘We must understand and address the reasons why a few practices might be in difficulty, with the focus being on providing support and enabling improvement to deliver safe and quality care to patients.’

‘However, it is important not to create a counterproductive blame culture based on isolated examples that would wrongly damage patient trust in wider GP services.’

Dr Michael Dixon, chair of the NHS Alliance told Pulse that the scheme could help general practice by removing ‘bad apples’ who provide ammunition for negative stories, but that it shouldn’t be ‘punitive’.

Dr Dixon said: ‘There does need to be an assurance process that every practice is of a minimum standard. Otherwise the public can start questioning the quality of general practice; people can condemn us on the basis of an odd story or two.

But if we can say, there is this assurance process, and that every practice is of above a given standard - and i think that’s good for the rest of us. To put it bluntly, one or two rotten apples can put their mark on all the rest of general practice.

He added: ‘This should not be punitive in the first instance, [for those in special measures] I think it will be initially under close scrutiny, like in hospitals under special measures, but I think will also have a period of intensive care as well.’

This article was edited at 17:15, 15 July to include further comment and ammend the CQC statement.

Pulse July survey

Samsung HD TV - win - online

Take Pulse’s July survey and have the chance to win a Samsung Smart TV.

The survey covers a range of areas, from prescription charges to mental health, and discrimination to PMS reviews.

 

 

 



Readers' comments (14)

  • Put yourselves in special measures field and hunt

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Poor old Hunt, everyone else shuffled and he has to keep health. He really has risen to the highest level of his incompetence

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Professor going to 'tackle' GPs. Sure you can tackle and ostracize but you will only do that for a short time as there won't be any left in the Field. The GP scapegoat Hunt goes on.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The floggings will continue until morale improves™.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is an interesting proposal. I would like to know how they plan to do this in practices where the partners own the building. Remove the contract, yes. Take action via the GMC against individual doctors who are under performing, yes. Take over the management of a practice after removing the contract from a partnership who is renting premises, yes. Taking over a practice in premises owned by the partners, no chance!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    If they 'take over some of the decision making and administrative powers' of practice, it would be interesting to see whether or not they must also take over the liabilities of the partnership in question.

    This could become the route to avoid bankruptcy.........'fail' just enough to get the CQC in, then walk away.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chip, chip ,chip away. eventually you have nothing left......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This 99% better than average mentality is so sickening.
    Only 49% can ever be better than average. Where is the money and manpower going to come from to improve the "bad apples"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Practice stripped of decision making and administrative powers, where do I sign up to join this brilliant scheme.

    The administrators and managers who are going to take over the running of the practice who's going to pay them? If its me then how much - will they be cheaper than employing our own practice manager? What does (s)he do when they are running the place?

    This sounds a dream come true - external agency running the practice for free? Would free partners up to get on with running our business. Or have I missed something?

    I bet this is a con - nothing like this is ever a gift

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having seen the results of Steve Fields input into the CQC system ( ie incompetent ) this sort of rubbish is not surprising. Is he planning financial compensation for taking over a business owned by the partners and also taking over all the expenses in which case the Govt will need to borrow millions more. Haven't they learned after the out of hours opt-out fiasco that GPs offer fantastic value for money. Of course not - when you live on another planet as Steve Field does you don't learn anything - just act out your wierd fantasies

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say