Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Six quick tips for GP commissioners to help manage conflicts of interest

Specialist solicitor Oliver Pritchard offers six tips for GP commissioners on how to manage potential conflicts of interest.

1) Make sure you have a clear conflicts of interest policy which is communicated and understood within the CCG.

2) Ensure you encourage a culture which supports declarations of conflicts of interest.

3) Consider governing body and wider GP training and stress that the rules are designed to protect the reputation and integrity of the individual as well as the organisation.

4) Keep your register of interests up to date and ensure participants at meetings are invited to declare conflicts at the beginning of meetings and when they arise during meetings.

5) Keep written records of conflicts of interest which are declared and detailed minutes of meetings to show how those conflicts were managed. This is your best defence if challenged later!

6) Consider securing clinical input from providers who don’t have the conflicts of interest - your constitution will often allow the CCG to co-opt members from health and wellbeing boards or neighbouring CCGs to vote in cases where conflicts of interest arise.

Oliver Pritchard is head of commercial health at Browne Jacobson LLP

Readers' comments (2)

  • Those who are good doctors and leaders do not need any guidance or regulation and those who are bad know how to bend the rules and regulation. Doctors must never have any conflict of interest and those who do are unfit to be leaders

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We get visits from CCG Medicines Management Team from time to time to scrutinise patient records, presumably to monitor compliance with their prescribing protocols. Would anyone care to comment as to whether this is acceptable?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say