This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Missed cancer treatment targets raise concerns over capacity to implement new NICE guidance

NHS trusts breached the 62-day cancer treatment target over the summer, the third quarter in a row the target has been missed this year, latest statistics have revealed.

The figures came just as NICE set out draft guidance to boost GP urgent referrals for suspected cancer, leading to concerns waiting targets will slip further as hospitals are faced with up to twice the current volume of investigations.

The waiting times, published by NHS England, showed that nationally, 83.5% of patients received treatment for cancer within 62 days of their initial referral – compared with the national target stipulating 85% should be treated within this time.

This was slightly down on figures for the previous two quarters, when the target was also missed with 84.1% and 84.2% of patients treated in time.

Leading GP cancer experts said the missed targets showed the system was under strain and would likely get worse if the draft NICE guidance is carried through – but that this should prompt policy makers to increase resources for cancer investigations in both primary and secondary care.

The draft guidelines, released today lowered the threshold for the positive predictive value of symptoms that should trigger a cancer assessment from 5% to 3%, meaning that GPs will be required to refer patients aged over 40 with unexplained weight loss and abdominal pain and those aged 60 and over with weight loss and new-onset diabetes among other new recommendations.

Dr Richard Roope, cancer lead for both the RCGP and Cancer Research UK, and a part-time GP in Fareham, Hampshire, told Pulse waiting times were being missed partly because of the loss of cancer networks since the NHS was reorganised in April 2013, but said an increase in pressure on the system could provide a necessary lever for greater investment in staff as well as imaging technology and other tests.

Dr Roope said: ‘The missed targets are partly pressure on the system, but also the cancer networks came to an end at the end of March 2013 and they were much better resourced in terms of manpower, and there was much more active engagement on two-week wait, and 31- and 62-day targets.

‘When that all changed and strategic clinical networks came in, that manpower was significantly reduced.’

He added: ‘There would inevitably be concerns there will be even more pressure on the system with the new NICE guidance, but to a degree it is one of those situations where, until you have that pressure nothing is done about it – what is the motivation to invest more and improve the service?

‘So, for example, there is going to be no extra investment in CT scanners unless they are all fully booked – whereas, if the demand goes up the supply might. And hopefully, as these are only draft guidelines we have time to address some of the infrastructure and personnel issues before they are introduced.’

Professor Greg Rubin, professor of general practice and primary care at Durham University and lead investigator on the national audit of cancer diagnosis in primary care, agreed the increased referrals should put the onus on policy makers to increase capacity for investigations.

Professor Rubin said: ‘It is a question of public policy whether we want to use our healthcare resources to detect cancer earlier in people with lower risk symptoms by using an urgent referral pathway.

‘When people say, we can’t do this because it is going to increase referrals – what I think the message is going to be, yes, NICE knows it is going to increase referrals and that is what it wants to happen – so somebody is going to have to find ways to deal with that.’

He added: ‘Individual GPs do not have a responsibility for limiting referrals, they have a responsibility to making appropriate referrals. And if NICE advise it is appropriate to refer at this lower threshold, then that is the sanction that they require.’

Dr Andrew Green, chair of GPC’s clinical and prescribing committee agreed an increase in referrals could lead to better resourcing of cancer services, but cautioned that outcomes could worsen if waiting times are impacted in the short-term.

Dr Green said: ‘The guidance will inevitably result in increased referrals, and indeed that might not be a bad thing, and for cancer mortality to improve the relentless pressure on GPs to reduce referrals needs to end.

‘Secondary care trusts will find it increasingly hard to meet targets, and there is a danger that outcomes might worsen if waiting times for the most at-risk referrals increase due to the higher numbers of low-risk patients. This is a politically sensitive area and we also need to ensure that the secondary sector does not use this increased activity as a magnet for additional funding, so reducing primary care’s proportion of the total budget still further.’

Dr Green added: ‘My hope is that CCGs will be able to find imaginative ways of meeting this need, and that might include practices being enabled to provide more investigations than they can at the moment.’

>>>> Clinical Newswire

Readers' comments (5)

  • Vinci Ho

    One person who is really laughing behind the scene is Agent H because he has really made the heads of everybody especially the academics (of course CQC on the matter of intelligent monitoring )spinning around with no mentioning about funding.
    Don't you all see now the black magic of politics? We are 6 months away from general election, ladies and gentlemen!
    The political show goes on.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    After 6 years , I finally understand the lyrics of one of my favourite songs , Human- The Killers(2008), replace the word 'dancer' with 'puppets':


    I did my best to notice
    When the call came down the line
    Up to the platform of surrender
    I was brought but I was kind

    And sometimes I get nervous
    When I see an open door
    Close your eyes, clear your heart
    Cut the cord

    Are we human or are we dancer?
    My sign is vital, my hands are cold
    And I'm on my knees looking for the answer
    Are we human or are we dancer?

    Pay my respects to grace and virtue
    Send my condolences to good
    Hear my regards to soul and romance
    They always did the best they could

    And so long to devotion
    You taught me everything I know
    Wave goodbye, wish me well
    You've gotta let me go

    Are we human or are we dancer?
    My sign is vital, my hands are cold
    And I'm on my knees looking for the answer
    Are we human or are we dancer?

    Will your system be alright
    When you dream of home tonight
    There is no message we're receiving
    Let me know, is your heart still beating?

    Are we human or are we dancer?
    My sign is vital, my hands are cold
    And I'm on my knees looking for the answer

    You've gotta let me know

    Are we human or are we dancer?
    My sign is vital, my hands are cold
    And I'm on my knees looking for the answer
    Are we human or are we dancer?

    Are we human or are we dancer?
    Are we human or are we dancer?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • that will be the fault of the gps of course, the snow in usa is too

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You have to wonder whether more years of life would be gained by targeting resources to speed up assessment of the patients already referred rather than assessing more patients.

    Or can we assume that someone has already done this calculation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cancer survival improves with earlier staging so it's not unreasonable to try and improve this.

    Problem I have with such a blanket approach is there is no guarantee more referral equals earlier detection. In fact published research from Yorkshire (I think) a few months ago showed no change in this, no has it improved pick up rates.

    We have to be mindful more resources at diagnosis end may mean less resources at treatment end (or other parts of health care).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say