This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Patients to be allowed to self-refer for cancer diagnostics without going through GP

Patients will be able to self-refer themselves for cancer diagnostics without needing to go through GPs as part of NHS England’s new strategy for tackling cancer, which GP leaders said could ‘undermine GPs’ gatekeeper role’.  

As part of NHS England’s early diagnosis programme announced over the weekend, it will pilot initiatives to offer patients the option to self-refer for diagnostic tests, lower referral thresholds for GPs and introduce multi-disciplinary diagnostic centres where patients can have several tests in the same place on the same day.

It will also set up a taskforce to develop a five-year action plan for cancer services based on the pilots that will include representatives from the RCGP, as well as Macmillan Cancer Support, Public Health England and local councils.

The initiatives will be piloted across more than 60 sites around the country, and they could be implemented from 2016/17, NHS England said.

This comes as NICE published draft guidelines that lowered the risk threshold for which potential cancer symptoms should be referred to diagnostic centres and specialists.

Pulse has already reported that GPs are having urgent cancer referrals bounced back by secondary care, and GP leaders warned that this move could increase the pressure on diagnostics centres, as well as undermining GPs’ role as gatekeeper.

NHS chief executive Simon Stevens said that NHS England’s plans could save 8,000 lives a year.

He said: ‘Cancer survival rates in England are at an all-time high, but too many patients are still being diagnosed late – up to one in four only when they present in A&E.

‘So it’s time for a fresh look at how we can do even better – with more focus on prevention, earlier diagnosis and modern radiotherapy and other services so that over the next five years we can save at least 8,000 more lives a year.

But Dr Kailash Chaand, deputy chair of the BMA and a retired GP in Lancashire, warned that this could undermine GPs’ role as gatekeepers.

He said: ‘There are two issues in this. Fiirstly, who is going to benefit from this? If it benefits patient outcomes, then that is good. But anyone who has a headache for three days might think it is a brain tumour. Overall the whole appointments systems for diagnostics will get messed up. The total outcomes will be limited.

‘Secondly, for the past 10-15 years, the GP role as a gatekeeper has been undermined, with the likes of walk-in centres. This is now going full steam. I won’t be surprised if politicians start saying we don’t need GPs.’

Dr Maureen Baker, chair of the RCGP, said that she welcomed the move, but said the college will look at the proposals to self-refer.

She said: ‘An average GP might see eight new cases of cancer for every 8,000 patient consultations and 75% of referrals made after just one or two GP consultations lead to a positive diagnosis.

‘However, there is always more that can be done and the early diagnosis programme to improve cancer outcomes, is particularly welcome – as is the proposal to create diagnostic centres that could do multiple tests in a single day.

‘We are prepared to look at all the proposals, but in the case of self-referral we would need to understand how it could work effectively without diverting resources from other services.’

Related images

  • ultrasound scan cancer diagnostics PPL

Readers' comments (52)

  • So when patients fail to make a diagnosis they can sue themselves .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is there anything Maureen Baker does not welcome ? How little do we respect our profession and amazing how the people representing us have no backbone and seem to agree with any initiative that comes our way...however nonsensical it may be

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are General Practice & A & E in a state of crisis? Because patients can access them directly free at the point of use without any consideration of the costs involved. Now the DoH wants to do the same to Oncology while NHS finances are stretched to the limit. Think again Mr Stevens.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Have they never heard of VOMIT?

    Victims Of Medical Imaging Technology

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1126156/

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm coming to the conclusion the underlying agenda is that General Practice is of 'no value' and 'needs to be disbanded' along the lines of the myopic lunacy of folk like Prof M Thomas.

    You get this theme in so may story's published in this magazine these days. I read the other other day that the guy in charge of NHS Englnd recons physical GP appointments will be 'a thing of the past' in 'New Towns' with everyone simply using a smart phone app.

    To be honest, I say, let them have what they wish for. I hope these numbskulls rot. I know enough about the human condition and illness having been a GP for a decade to know you can't replace a Dr with a Google account and access to Skype. Plenty of folk (mostly those who haven't ever had the misfortune of being chronically ill) are under the delusion that you can.

    So be it. The evil part of me will enjoy watching them chase their own tail down the rabbit hole.

    I won't have a job doing what I'm doing now but I'll be able to have a laugh all the same.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When you check the number of imaging companies that donated to Tories in run up to last election......can't help but be a tad cynical.

    Perhaps Macmillan will be putting in a bid for this as well (as Staffs). I can just see the Macmillan staff in the triaging cubicle at the back of Walgreens Boots Alliance (that's Boots to you and me) - after all, greasing palms is nothing new for Boots' new partner - $7.3m to political campaigns in last 15 years in USA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One word
    Daft

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "That’s the standard technique of privatization: defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital."
    Noam Chomsky,
    There is no hope for the NHS..
    47 year old Dedicated GP partner currently off with burnout

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • in these days of over burdned gap's,let them get on with it.you can only take the political mules to the water .....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | GP Partner | 12 January 2015 11:20pm.

    well said.one of the few people who know Noam Chomsky and probably Norman Finkelstein as well

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say