This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

NHS Health Checks no more effective than usual practice, study finds

GP practices offering NHS Health Checks did not identify any more patients with diabetes or cardiovascular diseases than they would have if they just continued with their usual practice, a study in the Midlands has found.

The study from Warwickshire, published in the British Journal of General Practice, found there was no statistical difference in the change in prevalence of coronary heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease or atrial fibrillation between the practices that offered NHS Health Checks and those that did not during a three-year period.

GP experts said this study was further evidence that the scheme, which was first instituted in 2009 and aims to offer five-yearly checks of blood pressure, cholesterol, weight and lifestyle to all people aged 40 to 74 years, was ‘not working’ and the editor of the BJGP said it cast further doubt on the future of the scheme.

This is the latest in a series of setbacks for the scheme, following criticism from GPs, including former RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada and other leading clinicians, who called for the programme to be scrapped, while even Public Health England advisors have questioned the value of the programme in its current form.

The Warwickshire study looked at the QOF disease registers of 38 GP practices offering NHS Health Checks and 41 practices that did not offer them between June 2010 and March 2013.

Out of a total of 16,669 NHS Health Checks, 1,142 previously undiagnosed cases of disease were picked up over the study period – equivalent to a new case per 6.85% of Health Checks done.

The prevalence of diabetes fell by 0.40%, from 5.9% to 5.5% in the practices that carried out NHS Health Checks and by 0.34%, from 4.56% to 4.19%, in the other group.

Similarly, the prevalence of coronary heart disease went down 0.1% in both groups, while that of hypertension went up by 0.46% in the NHS Health Checks group and 0.30% in the other group.

The study authors, led by Dr Michael Caley, a specialist registrar in public health and general practice from Public Health Warwickshire, concluded: ‘The implication of this result is that provision of NHS Health Checks in GP practices may not be different from usual care at increasing the reported prevalence of the five conditions examined, despite the apparent detection of disease in 6.85% of all Health Checks delivered.’

They add: ‘CCGs and public health departments may not be able to rely on NHS Health Checks to reliably case find and increase prevalence of certain conditions over usual care.’

The programme was rebooted last year by Public Health England in a bid to achieve the Government’s goal of reaching 15 million eligible people by 2018.

But studies have shown poor uptake of the checks and that they fail to pick up those patients most at need, potentially worsening health inequalities. One recent study showed NHS Health Checks cost twice as much as opportunistic testing.

Professor Roger Jones, editor of the British Journal of General Practice, said the study ‘casts further doubt’ on the programme.

Professor Jones said the researchers had found no advantage of the Health Checks, ‘suggesting that they may provide little benefit over case-finding as part of usual care, and may not represent good value for money for commissioners of care’.

Dr Margaret McCartney, RCGP council member and a GP in Glasgow, said the study was further evidence the programme ‘is not working’ and is being pushed through for political reasons.

Dr McCartney told Pulse: ‘It’s very sad that the NHS Health Checks scheme is continuing despite accumulating evidence from elsewhere that it’s not working.’

‘The massive problem with [NHS Health Checks] is a huge amount of money has been spent on them when there’s not the evidence to support them. If someone had said right at the beginning, let’s do a randomised controlled trial, we’d be pretty much sorted out by now and know what path to take based on evidence.’

‘And yet we’re still dithering around, with more and more evidence accumulating they don’t work, and it is mandated - it is illegal not to do them. We know health inequalities continue to rob people of years of life they could have had, and this is the best politicians can do – and I just don’t think it’s good enough.’

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (6)

  • Shocking. Next thing you'll be telling me is that bears sometimes open their bowels in the woods.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But they are an easy income stream so make hay while the sun shines!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great - lets pour more NHS money down a pit as the politicians try and win votes with pointless policies, while core care is left unfunded, and operations and medication needed is left unfunded, and GP practices are stripped of more funding to pay for deficits elsewhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Acquiescing to easy income streams over the last 10yrs have become a characteristic of gp independent contractors.It mostly flies in the face of their sense of integrity which has been lost because of a political masterstroke ie tying it in with the maintainence of income-not an increase.As a result objectivity has disappeared out of the widow on many occasions.This has given even more heavy calibre ammunition to the uneven handed and politically motivated newspapers Little wonder gp morale is now lower than a limbo stick.The news that a small number of "leading gps" have spoken out in favour of privatization is another own goal.I see no evidence of our royal college,the BMA, or LMCS.taking a strong stance on any of this--who do they represent-not me!!!!.It sure is lonely out here!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Totally agree with Dr Murray - GPs just giving in and taking on more and more is taking its toll. Focussing on daft ideas like this prevents us from doing the job we have been trained to do. As for increased income streams - doesn't is more work for less.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • maybe if the health check was combined with an astrology reading it would be more effective ... preferbly using a telehealth approach?

    i do hope we add in friends and family feedback as well just to complete the experience.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say