This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Statins 'could be prescribed for prevention of thrombotic complications'

GPs could in future prescribe statins more widely for the prevention of thrombotic complications, GP researchers have claimed.

The team carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 studies of statins and found people who took statins had a 15-25% lower relative risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), compared with non-users.

The findings, published in the Lancet Haematology, ‘suggest a role for statins in the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism’, the researchers said.

Analysis of data from 13 observational studies of statins, including over three million patients, indicated the relative risk of VTE was reduced by25% in statin users compared with non-users.

In 23 randomised controlled trials, involving over 100,000 patients, the overall relative risk for VTE was15% lower with statin treatment, compared with placebo.

Co-investigator Professor Kamlesh Khunti, professor of primary care diabetes and vascular medicine at the University of Leicester, and co-director of the Leicester Diabetes Centre, said: ‘These results provide an extensive body of evidence on the clinical benefit of statin in the occurrence of VTE and may support a true protective effect. Prevention of VTE may be another potential indication of statins.’

Lead researcher Dr Setor Kunutsor, from the University of Bristol’s musculoskeletal research unit, said statins may prevent VTE by ’downregulating the blood coagulation cascade, leading to reduced tissue factor expression, which causes reduced thrombin formation’.

Lancet Haematology 2017; available online 12 January


Readers' comments (3)

  • David Banner

    "Those flipping statins you prescribed to stop me getting pains in my calves are causing pains in my calves"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Knowledge is Porridge

    How helpful is our statin monitoring? Surely they are a safer drug than ibuprofen and aspirin not to mention fags and booze. They should be easily and cheaply available OTC at reasonable doses.
    How many lives are saved by safe prescribing compared to those lost by restricted access?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting how they cite a relative risk reduction as opposed to an absolute risk reduction.

    In reply to Knowledge is Porridge- I look forward to the day when I can stop off at the offy on the way home and pick up some crestor along with 20 B+H and 4 tins of Kestrel Super. With the focus on holistic healthcare these days I think its vital that I am allowed to address my lipids, VTE risk and the reality of my life with ease. I do sometimes fear that this combination will simply provide me with decades of a miserable and incapacitated life as a burden on the state and drain on whatever resources remain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say