This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

​Switching diabetes patients to sulfonylurea linked with complications

GPs should consider adding a sulfonylurea to existing metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes rather than switching to sulfonylurea monotherapy.

A major study including 77,000 patients in UK primary care who started metformin for type 2 diabetes between 1998 and 2013 found that this course of action had better cardiovascular and mortality outcomes for patients.

They suggested this was related to the cardiovascular protective benefits of metforming.

During the follow-up period, just under 26,000 patients were either switched onto sulfonylureas as a second-line treatment option or had the drug added to their metformin treatment.

But the researchers, based in Canada, found this group of patients were 26% more likely to have a heart attack and 28% more likely to die from any cause compared to those who stayed on metformin alone.

They were also 18% more likely to die from a cardiovascular cause and had a seven-fold increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia

The researchers found that patients were at greater risk of heart attack and all-cause mortality when they switched to a sulfonylurea rather than adding one on to their metformin.

They pointed out that switching to sulfonylureas may drive adverse cardiovascular outcomes due to losing the protective effects of metformin.

They said in the paper: ‘Metformin is associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events and low rates of hypoglycaemia. Supplementing treatment with sulfonylureas, a potentially cardiotoxic class with high risk of hypoglycaemic events, may outweigh the benefits of metformin.

'In line with current recommendations on the treatment of type 2 diabetes, continuing metformin when introducing sulfonylureas is safer than switching.’ 

BMJ 2018; available online 18 July

Readers' comments (5)

  • Isnt it about time SU monotherapy was removed from guidelines for long term treatment - too much unsafe about it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Adding almost anything but a Sulphonylurea would be abetter choice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    While the role of SU in some patients cannot be ruled out, I cannot see SU as a mono-therapy has any chance to stand these days , as alternative choices are plenty. Intolerance of metformin is common but so often , patients do get used to it with time , especially lower dosage at least .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • a very unlikely course of action ?nothing better to study

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Loving the new verb ‘metforming’

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say