This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

The docbot will see you now

GPs should check annually whether vulnerable patients are living in cold homes, says NICE

GP practices should check at least once a year whether their elderly or vulnerable patients are at risk from living in a cold home, and where needed refer them for help, say new NICE recommendations unveiled today.

In wide-ranging new public health guidance aimed at cutting the estimated 24,000 excess winter deaths a year, NICE is calling on GPs to identify their patients who live in cold or hard-to-heat homes, particularly the elderly and those with chronic conditions who are vulnerable to cold weather.

Once identified, GPs should include any concerns a patient is living in a cold home on their records, and share the data with relevant local organisations so they can get help with getting adequate heating and insulation, says NICE.

It also recommends that health and wellbeing boards should set up a ‘single point-of-contact health and housing referral service’ in their area which GPs and other health professionals, as well as other public and charitable services, can refer people to for support.

The recommendation comes after health secretary Jeremy Hunt suggested GPs could prescribe lunch clubs and damp treatment to their patients as part of a more ‘holistic’ approach to commissioning.

GP leaders said the suggestion GPs could review patients annually was ‘ludicrous’.

The new advice for GPs comes as part of a raft of recommendations for local health bodies, councils and community organisations as well as the NHS to tackle ill health resulting from cold homes - defined as those where the temperature falls below 21 degrees Celsius.

It says GPs should ‘at least once a year, assess the heating needs of people who use their services, whether during a home visit or elsewhere, taking into account the needs of groups who are vulnerable to the cold’, using their time with people ‘to assess whether they (or another member of the household) are experiencing (or are likely to experience) difficulties keeping their home warm enough.

GPs would also be required to ‘in collaboration with relevant local authority departments, use existing data, professional contacts and knowledge to identify people who live in cold or hard-to-heat homes’.

It adds they should ‘include this information in the person’s records and use it (with their consent) to assess their risk and take action, if necessary’.

Dr David Sloan, public health expert and former GP who co-chaired the guidelines, said GP practices would be ‘seeing these patients anyway’, for example offering them flu vaccinations.

He said: ‘It’s trying to get awareness of cold as an issue in its own right embedded in the system. Many practices are doing old-people checks anyway – but “think cold” within that, or something else you’re doing.’

Dr Sloan added that while care would be needed to make sure patients had given consent to sharing information about their risk from housing issues, concerns around data sharing should not get in the way of helping patients in need.

He said: ‘Data sharing at a local level is tricky, it has to be done with consent and people need to be clear about what they can and can’t pass on – but not passing on information is leaving people at risk.’

NICE experts said cold homes are a cause of the 24,000 excess winter deaths every year – with the elderly, people with chronic health problems, such as cardiovascular or respiratory conditions, and babies and young children particularly at risk.

They said the guidelines offer a ‘huge untapped opportunity to spot and help vulnerable people’ and that ‘every contact that a vulnerable person has with health and care staff and heating engineers is a chance to improve health and save lives’.

NICE said that although it has not done any economic analysis to back up the initiative, a recent Age UK report estimated cold homes were costing the NHS around £1.36bn a year in avoidable GP visits, prescriptions and admissions.

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said GPs would be willing to ‘signpost’ people for support heating their homes but questioned whether services would be adequately funded.

Dr Vautrey said: ‘The reality is that local authorities are having their funding slashed and the availability of services is often non-existent. There’s no point GPs rushing round with thermometers and checking heating if there’s no real support to be put in place afterwards.’

Dr John Grenville, chair of Derbyshire LMC, agreed with the principle of GPs signposting people to support on housing, but said they would need extra resources.

Dr Grenville said: ‘The only way to make it compulsory would be to make it a contractual obligation with money attached to it – it all takes time and that’s what GPs don’t have.’

Dr Andrew Green, chair of the GPC clinical and prescribing subcommittee warned GPs could not be major players in the scheme - and that the recommendation they review patients yearly was ‘ludicrous’.

He said: ‘GPs do come across people in cold homes, and when we do this should be addressed as we would any other risk factor for disease, but this involvement is bound to be sporadic and hence we cannot be regarded as major players in this work, which must remain the responsibility of others.

‘As often happens, the actual guidance appears to have got carried away with itself, and suggestions that we should assess “the heating needs of people who use our services at least once a year” is simply ludicrous and distracts attention from otherwise valuable advice. As ever, NICE should be asked “what activity would you like me to stop to enable me to do this?”, a question frequently put, but never answered.’

Dr Tim Ballard, vice-chair of the RCGP, welcomed the new guidance, saying that healthcare ‘had an important part to play’. He added: ‘We look forward to [the guidance] being a catalyst resulting in some of the most vulnerable in our society having the opportunity for a better quality of life in dryer warmer homes.’

Source - NICE guidelines: Excess winter deaths and morbidity and the health risks associated with cold homes

 

Readers' comments (67)

  • NICE --> N- Not
    I - In
    C - Control of
    N - cog-N-ition

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NICE = National Institute for Cutting Expenditure

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • how 'bout

    N - number of
    I - idiots
    C - controlling
    E - everyone

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • on a serious note - is it possible for the BMA or GPC to ballot GPs on a vote of confidence on NICE. If so can we reject NICE and walk away and get on with clinical care?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Anonymous | Salaried GP | 05 March 2015 1:18pm
    on a serious note - is it possible for the BMA or GPC to ballot GPs on a vote of confidence on NICE. If so can we reject NICE and walk away and get on with clinical care?"

    What, and upset the cosy atmosphere when all the old chums meet at their club? Heaven forfend.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nice should check weekly whether or not they are still in the real world!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well - we're on our own folks!

    NICE are deluded and so far from the coalface it's a joke.

    Shame on the RCGP for being the government's mouthpiece on these sort of social issues and not backing grassroots GPs

    Even the GPC think we would be useful to signpost in these circumstances.

    Unless we unite and form a proper union, we are all f*cked.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are we being tested ??
    This is not now and never will be our job.
    National institute for comptemptible edicts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So how do we define 'cold'
    Do NICE publish an ideal temperature range for different age groups?
    Are we going to invite a plumber to our MDT and LTC meetings, so that heating systems can be assessed?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | GP Partner | 05 March 2015 5:23pm

    on page 6 of the 54 page document Cold Weather Plan for England 2014 Protecting health and reducing harm from cold weather it mentions '
    revision of the indoor temperature guidance in light of a recent literature review
    and stakeholder consultation to a broad minimum temperature threshold for
    homes in winter of at least 18°C (65F), with additional flexibility around the advice
    for vulnerable groups and healthy people'

    that document is actually referenced by the helpful short 58 page NICE document 'Excess winter deaths and morbidity and
    the health risks associated with cold
    homes
    NICE guideline
    Published: 5 March 2015' that those helpful folks at NICE spent the time and money (taxpayers) to write.

    Can't believe you guys have not read it yet !

    like a lot of the NICE documents it is brief with lots of helpful ideas. thank god we have NICE otherwise i would be totally lost.

    the question is does it go far enough ?

    take food poisoning for example - some of our patients due to ill health may not be able to properly clean themselves after doing a poo (arthritis, musculosketal problems etc) - if they then go and make a sandwich -> bingo food poisoning which we all know can kill. I'm waiting for NICE guidance on that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say