This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Emergency medicine service 'saved 40,000' GP appointments in a year

A pilot which has seen community pharmacies supplying emergency prescriptions has saved almost 40,000 GP appointments in one year, the primary care minister has said.

Steve Brine said that the NHS Urgent Medicines Supply Advanced Service (NUMSAS) saved 38,900 GP appointments between December 2016 and December 2017.

The scheme is being piloted as a national 'advanced service', offered on a voluntary basis to pharmacies in England.

As of January 2018, 3,674 community pharmacies were registered to provide the service – supplying a total of 29,177 NUMSAS items between December 2016 and October 2017.

The service, which enables a patient to urgently access a drug or an appliance, is available to patients referred to the pharmacy from NHS 111.

It can be provided by pharmacies that meet eligibility criteria including having a consultation room, using the Electronic Prescription Service (EPS) and a shared NHSmail mailbox.

Upon announcing the scheme, which was welcomed as a 'sensible' move by the BMA, the Government said it aimed to reduce pressure on GP out-of-hours and A&E services.

In response to a question from a fellow MP earlier this month about the contribution made by community pharmacies, Mr Brine said: 'Pharmacy will continue to be a trusted partner in delivering a world class NHS and the Government is committed to working with community pharmacy to help make this a reality.'

This story was first reported by Pulse's sister title the Pharmacist.


Readers' comments (5)

  • All very good but 40000 patients is probably the equivalent of 4-5 full time GPs, especially given these are simple how much did the scheme cost minister?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That is one appointment for each GP per year !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All pharmacies are contracted to provide an emergency supply to people who have lost medicines at weekends or forgot them on holiday. So seems silly to fund a parallel service. I guess the only difference is in the current contract the pharmacy can charge. But still seems like money spent by scheme to solve a non-problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No appointments as dont deal with them like that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Scheme generates an extra 40,000 attendances, but that's ok because the appointments are with a Pharmacist and not a GP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say