This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP prescribing crackdown after review finds 600 excess deaths a year

The health secretary has promised to make the NHS the 'safest healthcare system in the world' with a new scheme to trace GP prescribing errors and prevent 600 deaths in primary care a year.

The new national system will link GP prescribing with hospital admissions data for the first time and see if a wrong prescription 'was the likely cause of a patient being admitted to hospital'.

The move comes after a Department of Health and Social Care-commissioned study found nearly three-quarters of the 66m potentially clinical significant medication errors were in primary care.

But the chair of the RCGP said this scheme should not be used to 'admonish' GPs for making genuine mistakes and that the long-term solution was a 'properly funded NHS'.

Announcing the strategy, first floated last year, the DHSC said it would see 'new systems linking prescribing data in primary care to hospital admissions so the NHS can see if a prescription was the likely cause of a patient being admitted to hospital'.

The DHSC said this would 'initially focus on how different medicines may be contributing to people being admitted to hospital with gastro-intestinal bleeding'.

Under the new system, 'doctors will, for example, be able to trace whether a patient prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug on a regular basis ended up in hospital with a gastro-intestinal bleed because they were not given something to protect their digestive system', the DHSC said.

But whilst GPs would seemingly face stricter scrutiny, the DHSC said pharmacists would have 'new defences' for when they make 'accidental medical errors rather than being prosecuted for genuine mistakes as is the case currently', which the DHSC said would 'ensure the NHS learns from mistakes and builds a culture of openness and transparency'.

And health secretary Jeremy Hunt said: 'We are taking a number of steps today, but part of the change needs also to be cultural: moving from a blame culture to a learning culture so doctors and nurses are supported to be open about mistakes rather than cover them up for fear of losing their job.'

The announcement also included a target to 'accelerate' the rollout of electronic prescribing to more NHS hospitals this year, with the ambition to 'reduce errors by up to 50%'. It said currently only a third of trusts have a 'well-functioning' e-prescribing system.

The DHSC said the action comes in response to new research showing the 'shocking toll' of medication errors in the NHS.

The study, commissioned by the DHSC and carried out by researchers from the Universities of Sheffield, Manchester and York, estimated that there were 66 million potentially clinically significant medication errors in England annually, 71% of which were in primary care, where most drugs are prescribed.

They further estimated that primary care medication errors leading to hospital admissions caused 627 deaths and cost the NHS £83.7m a year. In total across the NHS they estimated medication errors caused 712 deaths a year, costing £98.5m.

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'What is essential, is that highlighting that prescribing errors do occasionally happen is not used to admonish hardworking NHS staff - including GPs - for making genuine mistakes, but to address the root cause, and in general practice that is intense resource and workforce pressures, meaning that workloads and working hours are often unsafe for GPs and our teams.

'New measures to help reduce prescribing risk are certainly helpful, but the long-lasting solution to this is a properly funded NHS with enough staff to deliver safe patient care.'

Medical Protection Society senior medicolegal adviser Dr Pallavi Bradshaw said: 'The move to bring in new defences for pharmacists who make accidental medication errors, rather than prosecuting them for genuine mistakes, is a step in the right direction.

'But to bring about a real shift towards a culture of openness, learning and improvement from system wide mistakes, these defences would need to be extended to doctors and other healthcare professionals. There has never been a more important time to debate this issue, and we are pleased work is underway.'

BMA GP committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said the 'vast majority of prescribing is carried out to a high standard', adding that 'linking data to reduce prescribing risks is already happening in some areas'.

'The NHS needs to learn from these instances, and we hope these plans will lead to improved systems in hospitals and community settings that reduce the possibility of errors as much as possible.'

But he said it comes as GP practices 'are facing increasing demand on their services, with patients presenting with increasingly complex health problems, so the Government needs to continue to work with us to establish a workforce strategy', which he said should include 'greater involvement of pharmacists working in, or linked to, practices and surgeries'.

MDU medicolegal adviser Dr Caroline Fryar said: 'The MDU, of course, welcomes any initiative to improve patient safety. Medication errors can have a huge impact. For many years we have shared information with our members about common risks in order to help GPs to continue to practise safely.

'This initiative is unlikely to have any impact on the cost of indemnity.'

Labour's shadow health minister Justin Madders said: 'If we want the NHS to be the safest in the world then there are fundamental issues that need to be addressed.

'Ministers have to be much clearer about what extra funding and capacity they’ll be providing so that NHS staff can to do their jobs to the best of their ability, without mistakes, and to really ensure our NHS is as safe for patients as it can possibly be.'

A 2012 GMC analysis of prescription items found roughly one in eight patients was affected by a prescribing or monitoring error and, although only one in 550 errors was found to be severe, prompted changes to GP training.

A more recent audit of 500 practices’ prescribing, published in the BMJ in 2015, found around one in 20 patients received a prescription that should have been avoided as it could worsen their condition or interact with another medication.

GP leaders said at the time that pharmacist-led medication reviews could help boost safety and take pressure off GPs.

 

Readers' comments (61)

  • Thank you IDGAF idealist. How about sharing your real name since you trust the system so much and I bet my life you have time to read ALL the notes and letters in your perfect 10min consultation. Nothing against you but please just be realistic with the far from ideal high risk system we are working in. Yes we would all like to aim for the perfect consultation for our patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • CENSORSHIP?

    How many deaths due to trolleys outside a+e resus
    How many deaths waiting for ambulances
    How many deaths as no beds
    How many deaths as no opd appts
    come on Jeremy
    Lets look at the big picture
    Rather than pretending to care

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • already given up hope NI GP

    "wrong prescription"?????
    Are they referring to side effects by any chance, a possibility of any prescription?
    Initial focus on GI bleeds who knows what the buggers are taking over and above what we prescribe (ASDA best price brufen "every little helps"/grannies wee pink pills "they worked great for our jimmy")
    This has the appearance of some sort of mis-guided witch hunt

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • CENSORSHIP?

    They further estimated that primary care medication errors leading to hospital admissions

    There are increased hospital admissions as there is an aging population and to add to this winter and flu ...

    How many premature failed discharges end up bouncing back to hospital

    How many patients get discharged none the wiser about their medical problems?

    How many times does a specialist only concentrate on their area without considering the interaction with other systems

    Gen practice is clearly Jeremy's political football

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • JH want Gp land dead.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My friend is a vet. He charges £5.00 to make out 1 prescription.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My husbands barber charged £17 for 10 minutes hair cut

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • lol, :)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm guessing idgaf is a 2 sessioned portfolio idealist with all the time in the world

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • IDGAF who gives a monkeys of what secondary care colleagues think of us. Why are there certain gps with this odd subservient attitude? I do not practice my day thinking ooo what will the consultant think of me. if they think they're so great let them do the specialist drug prescribing and monitoring. Enjoy!
    Makes me question if IDGAF really is a nhs coal face gp or a whether that little CV is a load of baloney. IDGAF seems to spend all the time combing scripts that he/she probably has no time for seeing patients, visits etc etc. Seems to have no grasp of reality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say