This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs paid £50 to use motivational interviewing in medicine reviews

A CCG is paying GPs to use motivational interviewing in a bid to reduce its prescribing budget.

NHS Haringey CCG pays GPs £30-50 for each medicine review of patients with diabetes, asthma, AF or COPD.

The CCG said its £350,000-a-year Prescribing Quality and Saving Scheme incentivises motivational interviewing as an alternative to ‘often ineffective’ practices of just giving patients advice to change their behaviour.

The counselling technique requires GPs to guide patients and develop strategies to drive their motivation. This includes listening and using positive language to encourage change, the CCG explained.

Practices get paid for carrying out the reviews regardless of whether or not they achieve an overall saving to their prescribing budget.

For example, GPs are paid £30 per patient to review diabetes patients with poor glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and another £20 for a follow-up review.

GPs are paid £40 for asthma reviews (where patients overuse reliever therapy and underuse ICS); £30 for AF reviews and £50 for COPD reviews.

Although only the diabetes reviews stipulate GPs must use MI, the CCG recommends GPs ‘should’ use MI for the other conditions.

According to the CCG, data on the outcomes for the diabetes MI intervention to date has seen over two thirds of patients improve their HbA1c.

It said that in 2016/17 – when 85% of practices participated in the scheme - 1,263 diabetes patients were reviewed, out of which 64% were recorded with improved HbA1c at their follow-up appointment.

In 2015/16 practices reviewed 566 patients, out of whom 52% were identified with improved HbA1c.

The CCG said the main intervention recorded was ‘discussing/reviewing patient’s diet followed by introducing a new medicine’.

A CCG spokesperson told Pulse it had trained GPs in MI because ‘simply giving patients advice to change is often unrewarding and ineffective’.

They added: ‘Motivational interviewing uses a guiding style to engage with patients, clarify their strengths and aspirations, evoke their own motivations for change, and promote autonomy of decision making.’

Haringey-based locum GP Dr Mumtaz Ahmad said: ‘It’s less prescriptive, it encourages patients to change a habit because they get to see the pros and cons of continuing with their habits and feel more in control.

‘It usually works, as we get the patient involved in his own health matters and take responsibility for maintaining good health’.

Dr Andrew Green, prescribing policy lead for the BMA's GP Committee, said: ‘This is the first area that I have heard of to put practical steps in place to encourage this. I would welcome any help in offering an alternative to the default option, which is to increase the prescribing load carried by a patient who may already be struggling with their medication.’

He added: ‘We all know the power of words, and words spoken by GPs in particular can have a dramatic impact on patients. Choosing the right ones can be a challenge, and although some may be lucky enough to do this naturally, we can all learn new tricks.’

Readers' comments (13)

  • It works if the person is trained in motivational interviewing and has ongoing support/ supervision. It also takes a lot longer to do properly than 5-10 minutes.
    Who is overseeing this to check that the motivational interviewing is being given effectively?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Er. Forgive my lack of enthusiasm at the underwhelming statistic that 52% of patients had a lower HBA1c

    Inpr sure that means the other 48% had a higher one (or maybe exactly the same)

    This is called natural variability. It would be just as effective (and cheaper) to read aloud the obituaries from the BMj.

    I’m sure the £27,800 that the practice pocketed from this scam was well spent though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a good idea, resources reaching the front line.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the promise of resources in return for more work based on a gimic

    this is how the world is being run at present

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just wait until the Daily Mail get hold of this headline

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clearly a well funded CCG

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A good use of money, well spent.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    I wonder who’s idea this was, how much are they being paid? What do they actually do? Maybe they could scrap that particular role, and save themselves the considerable amount they are no doubt paying this self-justifier (along with all the cash they’d be wasting on this GP consultation micromanagement scheme). I bet that would help balance the prescribing budget immediately.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    ...perhaps they should fund a one off motivational interviewing study day, might cost them a couple of hundred quid. Might that not be a more efficient way of spending our money?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very rich CCG. In Medway you won't get funding for a stair lift for patient or even get paid the amount specifi9ed on your Open Exeter statements not to mention the £5 pounds paid to LMCs to help Practice to integrate - you have to pay to join Federations but you can't get any money from CCG to pay this membership although LMCs and CCGs have funding for this!
    Clearly Medway is a godforsaken place at least for BMEs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say