This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Pregabalin is just the beginning...

Drug companies are looking to use more ‘second patents’ to force GPs to prescribe branded medicines, finds Caroline Price

Court approved - SUO

GPs have been caught up in a legal dispute over a drug patent that is threatening the fundamental principles of prescribing in general practice.

A directive from the High Court has led to GPs being advised they must prescribe a branded version of pregabalin, known in the UK as Lyrica, when the drug is being used to treat neuropathic pain.

And experts are warning that the judgment is not just a one-off and that GPs could face further restrictions on their freedom to prescribe according to patients’ clinical need, as a result of similar legal judgments in the future.

Legal threat

The current threat has come from an attempt by pharmaceuticals giant Pfizer to enforce a so-called ‘second medical use’ patent on the drug pregabalin, after it claimed it still had marketing rights for the drug for neuropathic pain.

Following an interim court order before a full court hearing in July, NHS managers have told GPs to prescribe the brand Lyrica by name when prescribing for neuropathic pain. GPs immediately expressed outrage, with many denouncing the ruling as ‘immoral’, saying it contravened a ‘fundamental principle’ of general practice – that GPs prescribe based on clinical judgment.

‘I initially refused to comply but felt I had to after the GPC’s advice’

Dr Steven Haigh

But it looks as though such erosions of this principle could become more common.

Experts are warning that more drugs are likely to be subject to the same type of claim Pfizer has launched for pregabalin.

They point to a greater focus on repurposing of existing medicines, with the advent of newer ‘biological’ agents in particular leading to surprising new indications.

Pfizer itself believes there will undoubtedly be further instances. A spokesperson tells Pulse: ‘Through the Lyrica example, Pfizer and the NHS have collaborated to set an important precedent in a situation that is likely to become more common as our understanding of medical conditions and science evolves.’

Common scenario

Experts in patent law agree there is a likelihood of similar suits impacting on GPs in future.

Graham Burnett-Hall, a solicitor who advises on intellectual property at Marks & Clerk, says this ‘will certainly come up again’, while Rowan Freeland, another lawyer specialising in patent law, from Simmons & Simmons agrees: ‘I think you could see this happening once every two years.’

Alexandra Pygall, intellectual property partner at law firm Stephenson Harwood, says the advent of newer types of molecules with unexpected actions means it is increasingly likely that researchers will find entirely new therapeutic uses for known substances or compositions.

What will happen if I don’t follow this guidance?

  • NHS England’s guidance tells GPs that when prescribing pregabalin for neuropathic pain, they must prescribe the branded version, Lyrica. But it is unclear what (if any) implications there are for GPs who ignore this advice.
  • Pharmacists have been told to ask GPs to re-prescribe Lyrica when prescribing pregabalin for neuropathic pain in a template letter from the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee, which has been endorsed by NHS England. The letter also mentions the possibility of Pfizer taking legal action – but does not specify against whom.
  • The Medical Defence Union has said GPs must be ‘mindful of their GMS/PMS contractual obligations, which state they must have “regard” for relevant guidance issued’. It adds that GPs should be able to ‘justify’ their position if they do not comply.
  • The GPC has said it would ‘advise doctors to prescribe Lyrica by brand when used for its pain control indication for the time being’ – although it has said that it is those supplying generic pregabalin, rather than prescribing it, that are likely to be open to litigation.
  • One local pharmacy chain flagged up prescriptions of generic pregabalin as a ‘significant event’, notifying NHS England, but stopped when the local area team said this was not necessary.

A glance at health coverage in the news reinforces this view. In one week in April, there were national headlines on how the diabetes drug liraglutide is being trialled for prevention of dementia in humans, an existing cancer drug is proving effective in Alzheimer’s disease and the ‘athlete’s foot drug’ miconazole is being touted as a potential future ‘cure’ for multiple sclerosis.

Ms Pygall explains: ‘For example, if a drug for cancer is found to be effective against Alzheimer’s you could see how a second medical use patent might come about, because it’s not an obvious development.’

This is not good news for GPs, but there remains confusion over the consequences for GPs who ignore guidance on second patents.

In the case of pregabalin, the Medical Defence Union has said NHS England could potentially use the GP contract to enforce their guidance.

Lyrica drug - SUO

Meanwhile, the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee has instructed pharmacists to ask GPs to resubmit any prescriptions that failed to specify Lyrica.

After taking legal advice, the GPC has told GPs they should go along with the guidelines. As a result, even GPs who initially resisted the ruling have fallen in line.

Dr Steven Haigh, a GP in West Calder and a Lothian LMC member, explains: ‘I started off refusing to do it, but further to all the correspondence we have had, I felt I had to comply.’

He adds: ‘The only advice we have received from the GPC left us with no choice but to change the prescriptions.’

But, for many GPs, the diktat is a fundamental threat to their professional integrity and smacks of the Department of Health bowing down to ‘Big Pharma’.

Even in the few examples when GPs are asked to prescribe drugs by brand – such as anti-epileptics, because of variations in the bioavailability between drug formulations – the final decision is down to GPs’ clinical judgment.

But, as Dr Haigh explains, this ruling ‘is asking us to change a prescription for a non-clinical reason to a more expensive form of the same drug, that is going to do the same job at much greater cost’.

Dr Andrew Mimnagh, GP and vice-chair of NHS Sefton CCG, believes NHS England’s intervention was ‘unnecessary’, with the court having ruled ‘reasonable accommodation’ was allowed.

But, Dr Mimnagh says, in issuing guidance, managers have overlooked one of the fundamental principles of medical practice which is that ‘you can use whatever you want as a doctor for whatever indication you want, even if it is not licensed’.

It is not just the principle that is at stake. Dr Haigh laments the addition of yet another piece of unfunded work.

He says: ‘Everybody always says “it’s not much work”– writing an extra letter here, just spending a few extra minutes there. But you have to remember that general practice is covering the whole spectrum of medicine and much social care as well.

‘We are endlessly being asked to do extra tasks that supposedly won’t take long but we have reached the point where we don’t have the capacity to do that any more.’

How pregabalin prescribing became an issue for GPs

July 2014

Original product patent for pregabalin (Lyrica) relating to epilepsy and generalised anxiety disorder expires – meaning generics companies can launch another version of the drug. However, Warner-Lambert, a subsidiary of Pfizer, also holds a ‘second medical use’ patent relating to a third indication – neuropathic pain – which does not expire until 2017.

September 2014

Pfizer starts discussions with NHS England and other stakeholders about developing guidance for prescribers and pharmacists on the ‘second patent’, after manufacturer Actavis confirms it is preparing launch of generic pregabalin.

December 2014

Pfizer seeks temporary injunction against Actavis and other generic manufacturers and writes to CCGs warning that it intends to contest infringements of the patent and they must issue guidance to prescribers.

January 2015

Pfizer fails in bid to take out temporary injunction against Actavis and others – but judge rules ‘the best solution to the problem’ is to ‘try to ensure that prescribing doctors prescribe pregabalin for the treatment of pain by reference to the brand name Lyrica’.

February 2015

High Court interim judgment orders NHS England and equivalent bodies to issue guidelines to GPs and pharmacists stating ‘pregabalin should only be prescribed for the treatment of neuropathic pain under the brand name Lyrica’.

Early March 2015

NHS England releases guidance telling GPs they should only prescribe Lyrica when newly prescribing pregabalin for neuropathic pain, while repeat prescriptions should be changed ‘as soon as possible’.

Mid-March 2015

NHS managers forced to intervene after a pharmacy chain started alerting the local area team to a ‘significant event’ whenever GPs prescribed generic pregabalin.

July 2015

Full court case on the use of the patent to take place.


Rate this article  (4.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (18)

  • So just don't prescribe it . There are effective alternatives .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Never prescribe it. Never. Have you read the side effect profile???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i dont see how they can intervene. doctors can prescribe off licence with other drugs so why not this

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I foresee huge problems with this drug as The media will claim that GPs have turned lots of people into addicts.
    Best not to use it at all- or leave it to secondary care, pain clinics etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In South Buckinghamshire Lyrica is blacklisted - we are not allowed to prescribe it. We dont even have a shared protocol where we can prescribe it if secondary care ask for it.
    We had one patient come out of John Radcliffe after spinal surgery with a 14 day supply and we could not get him any more.

    I wonder how much Pregabalin you could get with all the money everyone has spent arguing about it in court?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wholeheartedly agree with above. We should simply stop prescribing drugs that have become subject to patent trolling against the interests of NHS patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just another example of further workload to make our jobs more untenable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How many of us can remember all the liscensed indications for the drugs ? We tend to prescribe from a family of drugs, and if one does not suit we try another drug in the family.

    Straight jacketing us to only prescribe certain drugs for certain conditions is not in the interest of the patient, and it is unworkable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gabapentin fine
    Refuse we had a guy on this for anxiety and I wrote my first letter strongly opposing this
    Next thing the guy has severe liver failure

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Off label use is a bug bear .
    Many CCGs have red lights on drugs
    Our consultant advised onlanzapine onlanzapine for an autistic man which helped .dorset red lights it .
    My partner refused on these grounds ie red
    I gave it and was told by Dorset CCg it is red lighted and they would support me.
    Yet the advice is that patient would suffer so best interests require the drug

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say