This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Should GPs promote sustainable living as part of health advice?

Is it time GPs started advising patients on ways to reduce their carbon footprint as part of choosing a healthier lifestyle, asks Dr Mike Forsythe  

dr mike forsyth

It has been widely reported recently, to nobody’s real surprise, that we are destroying the planet.

I should clarify at this point that by ‘we’ I am referring to the human race, rather than doctors specifically, but perhaps there is a role for clinicians in the preservation of the environment.

After all, if predictions from scientists are accurate and we really do only have a dozen years to prevent irreversible damage to the planet from climate change, the implications of drought, floods, extreme heat and poverty will affect the health of everyone.

Do we have a responsibility, then, to encourage patients to limit their own environmental footprint? An argument could certainly be made that in the same way we recognise the detrimental impact that obesity has upon our patients, and encourage exercise and healthy living, we should be highlighting the importance of a lifestyle that doesn’t overly impact upon the environment.

Is an opinion on the plight of climate change a personal belief or a proven fact that threatens millions?

It is interesting to consider how this might work from a practical point of view. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tempered its gloomy assessment of the severity of the situation with an acknowledgement of the role individuals can play in ensuring a sustainable future.

There were suggestions that individuals may not have much control over, such as home insulation and transport methods, but there were also recommendations that have far more relevance. Eating less meat and dairy, for example, is considered by some scientists to be the single most effective way of reducing your impact on the environment. We regularly provide patients with dietary advice, so should this affect the nature of our recommendations?

The GMC’s Good Medical Practice offers guidance on expressing individual opinions, stating that doctors ‘must not express their personal beliefs [including political, religious and moral beliefs] to patients in ways that exploit their vulnerability or are likely to cause them distress’.

There will certainly be patients out there who would be distressed at being advised to eat less beef by their doctor for instance, but is an opinion on the plight of climate change, backed up by evidence-based studies, a personal belief? Or is it a proven fact that threatens the health and wellbeing of millions around the world?

There are issues beyond dietary advice that delve far deeper into the murky waters of ethical uncertainty. A recent study suggested that having fewer children was the single greatest impact individuals can make on reducing their carbon footprint, but no doubt the GMC would take a dim view on doctors advising patients against reproducing on the basis of environmental preservation.

So what is the answer? Do we as doctors have an obligation to advise our patients how best to minimise their impact on the environment? Or is our role merely to focus on each patients’ individual health, rather than the long term health of society as a whole?

Dr Mike Forsythe is a GP trainee in south-west London

 

Rate this article  (4.14 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (10)

  • No, too busy fixing boilers and issuing ad hoc fire safety advice, global salvation not mentioned in contract.
    Some clown, I am sure will consider us ‘ideally placed’

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Somebody should do it but can’t see why gp should be anymore appropriate than other agencies

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is this what Public Health and the government are supposed to do?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a few of us who care about such issues, and the vast majority who don’t give 2 s@&ts. They just consume as much as possible for status symbols and greed and can’t think beyond this. A government that proposed radical intervention would never be elected.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doctordog.

    Not sure why we in the UK should self flagellate about our carbon footprint so much, while other countries don’t give a sh-t, eg USA, China and others.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    “Do you have your prescription? Good, I’ll see you next month when your sick note runs out. Oh, before you go, have you sorted your plastics into the right bins? I hope you walked to the surgery today! And did you buy that electric car I was badgering you about last time? Yes, I know I drive a 4x4, but it snowed one day 3 years ago and I couldn’t get to work!”

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just fuck off- load of tosh?! Embarrassing
    - what other profession would take on the ills of society?!

    I’m busy enough looking after the MANY individuals ( that can actually get scarce appts ) and individualising their cate- my focus is not public health- and for a reason... focussing on the population is not focussing on what’s best for the individual in front of you!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely not. I have patients who are better qualified to advise me about sustainable living than I am to advise them or anyone else. I'm interested but it's not my area of expertise any more than treating high blood pressure is the recycling site operative's area of expertise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry I do not read the Guardian...but I do promote cryogenic treatment of free range eggs.....just in case there will be a need for healthy living once planet earth has evaporated!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There was an article yesterday saying that GPs should refuse to undertake unfunded public health work. If this is a health issue, it is clearly a public health one.
    I will not be adding this to my list of things to address in the consultation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say