This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GPs set to diagnose Covid-19 face to face in 'hot hubs'

GP-led 'hot hubs' are being set up around the country to diagnose and advise coronavirus (Covid-19) patients who are not in hospital.

CCGs are leading the commissioning effort, although NHS England has advised rather than mandated them to do so.

Under the schemes, patients are directed to the hubs for face-to-face assessment - which will include GPs - after being triaged remotely by NHS 111 or their GP.

Areas which have set up such hubs include:

  • The eight North West London CCGs
  • NHS Walsall CCG 
  • NHS Oldham CCG
  • NHS Gloucestershire CCG
  • NHS West Sussex CCG

NHS England said in a message to general practice on the weekend that it may be 'clinically necessary' for GPs to 'come into contact' with coronavirus patients 'for example, those identified most at risk, to provide them with the necessary treatment and care in a range of settings including the person’s own home, the GP practice, a local hub or an alternative care setting in the community'.

NHS Brent CCG said: ‘The eight CCGs in North West London are establishing a joint primary care response to Covid-19. This will include patients being managed both remotely and face to face by GPs.

‘Face-to-face management will require dedicated clinics and we are establishing these in each borough. Patients will access the clinic through referral by the NHS 111 service or their practice.’

North West London’s infection prevention control guidance for Covid-19 hubs reads: ‘PCNs should identify a suitable practice/location for suspected and confirmed Covid-19 patients to be cohorted for appointments.

‘These patients will need to access this service by private car and not use public transport. For patients that are suspected or confirmed positive for Covid-19, that cannot attend by private car, a home visit will be required.’

It also advises on aspects such as PPE, decontamination of equipment, and signage, while the area’s standard operating procedures describe the purpose of hot hubs as: 

  • To review patients with potential infection of Covid-19 identified as requiring clinical assessment and to determine whether telephone management or face-to-face assessment is required
  • Where non face-to-face means have been exhausted, to review patients with potential infection of Covid-19 in person
  • To review patients with potential infection of Covid-19 or known Covid-19 infections who require a face-to-face review for other health conditions whilst they are still infectious
  • To maximise self-care and ensure the maximum number of patients are cared for in the community.

Those excluded from the patient criteria include people who can be dealt with remotely; require hospital admission; or are non-ambulant.

However, some GPs have expressed concern with how effective the hubs will prove to be, and with regards to the safety of doctors.

Professor Trisha Greenhalgh, professor of primary care at the University of Oxford, said on Twitter: ‘I believe that hot hubs are a 20th century solution to a 21st century problem.

‘They’re resource-intensive and likely to create huge demand for face-to-face care. Let’s urgently design a better solution.’

In a similar vein, Dr Dave Triska, a GP in Surrey, where there are a number of hubs, told Pulse: ‘Hubs give some system resilience, allowing for both contingency plans should primary care facilities be unable to operate and also buffer for acute departments which will shortly become very busy.

‘They should only be used with robust remote triage, and not as a port of first call.

‘They’re not efficient at the moment, but from the really busy time coming, I wouldn’t expect them to be.’

Speaking to Pulse in a personal capacity, West London GP Dr David Mummery said: ‘Having hot clinics, likely inundated with large numbers of possible Covid-19 patients who don’t need hospital admission and who have been sent there by 111 or possibly fellow GPs, and who are at the mild/moderate end of the Covid-19 spectrum, goes completely against the advice to isolate.

‘They will be a risk to healthcare professionals and others, in terms of continued viral transmission and exposure to high viral loads, which we know correlates with the severity of the illness. Social distancing measures may be very difficult to adhere to and if the clinics are there and advertised, people will go there.

‘If face-to-face assessment is deemed essential, the best place is probably either the patient's home or an easy-access back room at the GP practice.

‘It’s also vital that GPs wear full PPE at all times.’

Pulse has reported extensively on the lack of adequate PPE supplied to GPs across the UK, with GPs reporting that they are told to source their own after being shipped small amounts of 'flimsy' equipment.

Related images

  • coronavirus quarantine getty rf cms

Readers' comments (46)

  • So what if you diagnosed Covid presumably with a reliable test. No vaccine, no antiviral. No PPEs. No PPE, no see.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very interesting article from Canadian website on why Italy might be showing a high death rate including seeing covid patients in same health care setting as non-covid patients

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bad idea

    If we are testing patients, maybe.
    If not -moving patients around with covid, infecting each other and staff and generally increasing viral load to all sounds crazy.

    What interventions have they got in mind?

    If I have appendicitis (only) don't send me there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Only antibody positive staff should go near the place.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ItSaDoGsLiFe

    KevlarCardie | Salaried GP02 Apr 2020 12:13pm

    No way. I’ve only just got over my last bout of jacuzzi nipple.

    Thanks KC, that brightened up my day

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ItSaDoGsLiFe

    Interestingly our CCG is proposing that we open up the bank holiday weekend, including all four days, without paying us .........or the reception staff.......
    Any takers?!?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How much worse does it have to get before we all die from stress and or exposure to Covid19.In addition to being told that our contract has now changed to staying open on the bank holidays with no pay and no annual leave.There should be mass resignation.Im sorry but I didnt sign up for this.-Magically judge who has Covid19 remotely ,without testing and guess who doesnt ,and see them potentially infecting myself.Is it me or does everyone still have good supplies of goodwill to accept all this .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A futile exercise in magnanimity that is being promulgated to satisfy patient’s expectations.
    Clinical outcome will be unaffected by F2F consultations which can be safely superseded by remote diagnostics
    Where is the leadership here?
    It looks disastrously like a secondary care solution to a primary care problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    In Ni now compulsory for all practices to man these
    Also we have to man them in and ooh
    So not gms
    We have been told if we do not obey there “ will be sanctions”

    Can’t you see that by rotating every GP through these central hubs you are exposing the pts and the hcw to high viral loads and could be incubation centres !

    Also imo a way to now bring GPs in line. Get rid of our autonomy and aim towards the 24/7 salaried service

    The thin end of the wedge

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think where people are obviously slightly critical here, I feel could be solved by better branding. We all love and are reassured by “brands”. In the spirit of reflecting on historical clinical figures like the “Nightingale Hospital “, what about branding these hot clinics “Typhoid Mary Clinics”?

    See it harks back to a famous figure in medicine, is obviously a brand, therefore is hugely reassuring, is obviously very safe as it now has a catchy name, every one will flood into them clinicians and patients included, clinicians will likewise go back to their practices spreading everything good (and obviously nothing bad) from the hot clinic to their own practices.

    Think the boffins above us have so far missed a trick! If only someone had come up with “Typhus Mary Clinics” brand sooner none of the negativity in the previous comments would have been needed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say