This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

GPs with Covid-19 symptoms should stay off work even if test is negative, says NHS

GPs and other NHS staff who have tested negative for Covid-19 should not return to work if they still have symptoms, NHS England has said.

The advice was issued in an NHS England webinar last night, during which the organisation said that ‘most’ negative test results will be accurate, though the positive test results are thought to be less precise.

However, NHS England officials acknowledged there will be some people who do produce false negative test results – due to either a poor swab sample or them only ‘shedding’ the virus in their lungs, rather than nose and throat, where the swab is placed.

Despite this, NHS England said the coronavirus testing system had so far helped 20% more staff return to work.

It comes as the Government has confirmed it has met its target of providing 100,000 coronavirus tests per day in the UK by the end of April – though there have been reports it changed its method of counting to meet its goal.

The Government now has 48 regional drive-through testing sites across the UK and 50 mobile testing units across England (see maps, below), while it is also sending out home-testing kits.

However, some regions do not have a nearby drive-through site and GPs Pulse has spoken with have warned it is not always feasible for staff to travel long distances if feeling unwell.

Meanwhile, GP leaders have warned that while self-testing kits make it easier for GPs to get tested, they ‘do pose a number of risks’, such as potential contamination and false results if the swab is not taken correctly.

During the NHS England webinar last night, the organisation’s testing cell incident director, Keziah Halliday, said: ‘If somebody has symptoms of any description then normal rules about illness apply – if someone is unwell, they should not be returning to work, irrespective of what their test result says.’

She added: ‘Just because they test negative for Covid, it doesn’t necessarily mean they haven’t got something else.

‘If they have symptoms, you would not want them to be back to work, just as you wouldn’t if they have any other virus.’

Dr Aidan Fowler, NHS England national director of patient safety, also said: ‘Although most people shed the virus early, we [sometimes take the test] just before their symptoms have developed and we don’t get high rates of virus, or they are only shedding from their lungs and we don’t see it in their nose and throat. Or the sample just wasn’t good enough.

‘Which is why it is important to have the safety net which says if you have symptoms that are very convincing – clearly if you are unwell you wouldn’t want to return to work – but if you have convincing symptoms and a negative test, you should be cautious about that.’

Earlier on he also noted: ‘Because most people do not have the condition, most of the negatives will be true.’

GPs have said they have already been asking staff to stay off work if they feel unwell, despite having a negative test result.

GP partner Dr Iain Matheson, from Inverness, said: ‘If we’ve got a staff member who is still symptomatic but had a negative test, we have been applying common sense and telling them to stay off until they feel better.

‘In an ideal world we would have a test that is 100% accurate but we don’t live in that world and it’s the best test we’ve got at the moment. The gold standard is repeat testing if you’re still symptomatic and I’m not sure just how practical that would be.’

Meanwhile, Dr Helen Price, a GP registrar based in the south west of England, who tested positive for coronavirus, said the lack of nearby drive-through testing sites in some regions was a concern.

She said: ‘I am lucky I live with my partner who could drive me. The way that I was feeling, there was no way I could have driven myself half an hour one way and half an hour back on a motorway to go and get tested.

‘A colleague of mine had the same dilemma because her partner is blind so she was the only one who could drive and she said she struggled to drive that far away.'

The RCGP has called for a ‘more thorough and consistent approach’ to testing by the Government.

Its chair, Professor Martin Marshall, said: ‘Self-testing kits might prove to be a useful solution for GPs who have difficulties accessing, and are located long distances from, testing sites.

‘Despite benefits of accessibility, self-testing kits do pose a number of risks such as potential contamination, and false positives and negatives. So, it is crucial that the guidance that accompanies these test kits is clear and robust, in order for GPs and their patients to have confidence in their accuracy and reliability.’

He added: ‘Plans for a more thorough and consistent approach to testing would be beneficial to GPs and other frontline workers, but only if these tests are readily accessible, and results are processed in a timely manner.’

GPs and all other NHS staff are due to be able to get tested for coronavirus 'whether or not they have symptoms', according to a Government announcement this week. So far only NHS staff who have symptoms have been eligible, largely by using drive-through facilities.

regional testing site status

regional testing site status

mobile testin unit status

mobile testing unit status

Source: Department of Health and Social Care statistics, as of 30 April

Readers' comments (26)

  • If we stay off work, who is going to do all of those Care Home Ward Rounds, or Assess all those patients that the Hospitals have discharged because of Covid?

    If we staff off, who is going to keep practices open for all of those Bank Holidays??

    If we stay off who is going to look after all those Shielded patients the government has created for us??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There were no self testing kits available on the website today when I directed the poorly punters to it. But the hospital are swabbing random asymptomatic employees to get the test numbers up

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Una Coales. Retired NHS GP.

    @Anon GP care home residents could be receiving HCQ, azithromycin and zinc against covid as they are doing in Texas nursing homes with success. Instead there were over 4000 care home resident deaths in the U.K. from suspected or confirmed covid between April 10 and 24 alone.

    “I am worried that when looking back, the U.K. will have fared worse by not treating and ‘waiting for evidence’ compared to countries that have treated while waiting for the evidence.”

    Countries that have treated covid early successfully with HCQ include: Korea, China, Turkey, Costa Rica, Australia, India, UAE, and parts of USA ( for example Yale New Haven Health System protocol). Country with a higher covid death per capita than USA and is still conducting RCT on HCQ with the Principle trial for the community and Recovery hospital trial: UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I’m sorry Dr Coales but I have to take issue with that. That is a potentially dangerous pile of non scientific crap that you seem to be spouting there.
    Waiting for the evidence is very important unless you take the imbecilic views of people like Trump. (That’s not a Fox News feed you are linking there is it?)
    Is it possible to do more harm by treating and not waiting for the evidence.?The answer is very simple. Yes. It. Is.
    Nothing wrong in doing properly constructed trials to try and establish the risk vs benefit in the meantime.
    As it stands there is no positive evidence for the chloroquine groups. That may well change of course. One way or the other. Or perhaps no difference at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don’t forget the vitamin C and D and er, that’s probably enough placebos for one day.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    There seems to be a much higher death rate in countries of high latitude, where VIt D levels are lower. Not proof of causality, I know.
    HCQ- difficult. I know Una is an advocate. There was an interesting observational study from PRC early on (no time for double-blind then) suggesting people's CTs improved more rapidly, as did virus shedding, if given HCQ and we know it has in-vitro activity. It's so safe, in modest doses, that I'd take it if I thought that I had Covid. By the time you get to ARDS, it's too late, of course. And possibly a bit before.
    Normally, we want to wait for a gold-standard trial, but we don't have time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, my husband had prolonged COVID. Friendly consultant left some hydroxychloroquine on our doorstep. I dosed this as per Belgium guidelines. He ended up in his own hospital and was assessed for ITU. But did not need it after all. Inflammation markers were shocking. So- I still think hydroxychloroquine is worth a try. Who knows how much worse he might have been?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Evidence based medicine is, to the first approximation, academic wooly cardigan crap. When you are fending off the grim reaper anything is worth a try. I'll cite iv steroid in crashing sepicemia. The uk nhs NICE has done just about everything wrong in the last two months with respect to COVID-19

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    I know it's a secular society and a secular profession..
    But in these times of COVID...
    Hopefully you'll be fine
    But if not..
    Make sure your Faith is correct and sound before you return to your creator..
    Pray before you're praid on..
    Return to your creator
    Before you return to your creator...

    Covid is nothing
    Compared to ending up in Hell

    The best of creation are those who analyse all paths and choose the correct one..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say