This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Specialists are out of touch with asthma diagnosis in general practice

Dr Mark Levy argues against claims of overdiagnosis among children with asthma

A recent Daily Telegraph headline really annoyed me: it stated that 50% of children with asthma have been incorrectly diagnosed. This was irresponsible journalism in my opinion, seeking to undermine GPs and create a sensational headline resulting in widespread TV coverage which alarmed many people with asthma. This was based on a Dutch research paper which based asthma diagnosis on spirometry.

There is no specific test for diagnosing asthma

There is no specific test for diagnosing asthma. It is diagnosed on clinical grounds based on a history of intermittent respiratory symptoms, a response to anti-asthma treatment and demonstration of variable airflow obstruction in the lungs. Acceptable tests of airflow obstruction include spirometry (which requires calibrated equipment, technical expertise and considerable co-operation by the patient) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) which can be adequately performed by most children over the age of five years. Peak flow meters are cheap, reliable and available in the NHS. The only proviso regarding PEF is that ideally patients should have their own meter, because meters may vary from one to another according to the standard set for manufacturers.

This is because asthma is a disease that fluctuates by definition – symptoms come and go, and lung function varies from time to time. Someone with asthma may be able to perform at an international competitive sports event one day, and on another, suffer a life threatening attack. Someone with intermittent respiratory symptoms, relieved by bronchodilator therapy, who performs normal spirometry in the surgery or hospital clinic, may still have asthma.

Sometimes repeated lung function tests are needed, possibly before and after bronchodilator treatment to make or exclude a diagnosis of variable airflow obstruction.

I am convinced that we can do better regarding asthma diagnosis and treatment in the UK, but I disagree with those who suggest that GPs must or should use spirometry as a first line test to diagnose asthma. While I do have a potential conflict of interest as one of the authors, the Global Initiative for Asthma, GINA, guide (which is more pragmatic than UK guidelines and written for busy GPs) includes serial PEF as one of the evidence based methods for diagnosing asthma.

In my own practice, I use serial PEF diaries both to diagnose asthma and as part of a personalised self-management plan. When I first suspect asthma, or if I change medication, I provide patients with a PEF meter and a chart which facilitates the process of diagnosis at the follow up review. Furthermore, this helps the patient or parent understand how the medication works, and provides very good information on when to worry. 45% of those who died from asthma in 2012 failed to call for or obtain medical assistance; not surprisingly, because 77% had no evidence of ever being provided with a personalised asthma action plan (PAAP). In my view, PEF diaries are a very useful adjunct to a PAAP particularly in managing an asthma attack.

Saying that GPs should just rely on spirometry will lead to underdiagnosis, a far greater danger than the overdiagnosis that the Telegraph article warns of.

Dr Mark Levy FRCGP is a GP in London, Respiratory Lead at Harrow CCG and executive board member of GINA.


Rate this article  (4.64 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (5)

  • We keep telling the GPs but all they want is to tick the spirometry qof box "because spirometry is Gold Standard". Not in my book - spirometry is patient and clinician dependant.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • correct in that we do want to tick the qof boxes because if we don't we don't get the qof monies paid but it isn't all we want to do - the quality of care that doesn't fit in the qof boxes, we still want to try to do in the increasingly -squeezed time we have left.I do think we underuse serial peakflows though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Spirometry companies, skewed incentive drug data and extortionate prescribing costs. This ailment is a business for some.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All non respiratory trained professionals diagnosing Asthma in Primary Care (particularly in Children) should undergo regular assessments and be certified following this study.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am still battling GPs who keep sending patients for spirometry in the midst of a chest infection when they are "short of breath". Others have piled on 3 stones in 3 years and do not fit in the chair.
    What was that on another article about status and medical degrees and others being stupid?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say