Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS tightens rules on pharmacists providing flu vaccinations

NHS Employers has told pharmacists they must specify which ‘at-risk’ group the patient falls into before administering the flu vaccination, following concerns they are being given to patients who are not entitled to free vaccinations. 

As part of the shake-up for next year’s pharmacy contract, the notification form to GPs will include an amendment asking them how the patients are eligible for vaccinations, including people with diabetes, heart, kidney and liver problems, respiratory diseases, and those whose immune systems may have been suppressed due to illness or treatments.

The scheme to allow pharmacies to provide flu jabs has been beset with controversy from the outset. In May Pulse revealed that the scheme led to over half of GP practices being left with unused flu vaccine at the end of this year’s flu season. And the flu scheme left GPs with a substantial £4m loss.

The critical amendment follows rising concern from GPs that some pharmacists are claiming for vaccines that are given to people who are not entitled to them from the NHS.

Dr Andrew Green, chair of the GPC’s clinical and prescribing subcommittee, told Pulse: ‘It is basic common sense. Why have a scheme where patients can walk in and claim a free flu jab just saying that they are eligible where there is no evidence for it? There is scope there for misunderstandings.

’Notifying GPs is the sensible thing to do. Where there is systemic misuse of the system – I am not saying that GPs should police it – but they may be able to pick up any unusual patterns.’

Key changes to the specification for next year’s scheme, which runs from 1 September this year to 31 March 2017, also includes a new IT platform for the patient questionnaire.

Concerns have been raised about getting records accurately updated to record those patients who had or hadn’t been vaccinated.

For example, it was revealed that at least a quarter of vaccinations administered in pharmacies in 2014/15 were not recorded on ImmForm, the database for recording all vaccine doses given to GP-registered patients outside the practice.

Earlier this year Welsh GP leaders were so concerned about the issue that they debated a motion calling for the pharmacy contract for influenza to be ’subject to post-payment verification checks on the categories of patients claimed for’.

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Readers' comments (9)

  • Cynical me thinks lots of these will be 'carers'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cynical me has been approached by many people who have been vaccinated in previous years by their GP even though they aren't eligible. They were often told to attend when the appointments had finished and they were running down their stock.

    Glass houses and all that...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @5.10 - I agree there has been some GP surgeries who have not been administering the system properly. It is totally unacceptable and probably fraudulent.

    Over the past few years NHSE have been much more strict and declining to fund many of these unnecessary cases.

    Quite right too - totally unacceptable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @5.10
    Doesn't mean they claimed for them - might have had unreturnable stock and patients keen to be vaccinated

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We were not usually informed when pharmacists gave flu vaccinations last year, leading us to chase patients who had already had it/lower uptake figures

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • exactly. GPs are entitled to give flu vax to people not in at risk groups, but this would be at their own expense!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like the idea of post payment varification checks...

    On all GP enhanced services

    Save the NHS a fortune
    Money for old rope

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If a pharmacy is vaccinating either non eligible patients or are not notifying the surgery of a vaccination, this is in breach of the service specification and should be reported to NHS England

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • how can we report "violations" Just had another labelled "low immunity" = not entitled to be paid an IOS fee for!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.