Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

£1bn uplift for mental health to come out of existing CCG budgets

CCGs will be expected to find the £1bn extra a year committed by NHS England to improve mental health care from existing budgets, Pulse has learnt. 

NHS England committed the extra funding this week following the publication of the mental health taskforce report, which recommended the funding uplift as part of an overhaul of mental health care in England. 

The committment will bring the total spend on mental health up from £11.7bn to £12.7bn a year by 2020/21.

On publishing the mental health taskforce report this week, NHS England said: ’The taskforce suggests, and the NHS accepts, investing over £1bn a year of additional funding in NHS care by 2020/21 to reach one million more people.’

But it has been unable to explain where the £1bn will come from, despite repeated attempts by Pulse to find out.

The Department of Health has said that the money will not come out of central government funds. 

The taskforce made a series of recommendations, including the creation of a new role - GPs who have an ‘extended scope of practice’ in mental health.

It calls on NHS England to ensure the creation of 700 GPs with an extended Scope of Practice in Mental Health’ or ’GPwERs’ by 2020/21. 

The report also says all GPs should have core training in mental health within five years.

An NHS England spokesperson rebuffed claims that the money was not ‘new’ money.

They said: ‘The mental health taskforce proposals need an extra £1 billion a year to be spent on new mental health services annually by 2020, and that’s precisely what we’re committing to.

‘Only the most bizarre mangling of that fact would claim this isn’t “new” money when it patently is new funding for mental health over and above what is being spent today, and money that is for the first time being earmarked for mental health from future funding growth. On any definition this is genuinely new investment in mental health.’

However, they refused to explain where the money was coming from.

GP leaders raised doubts about what CCGs will be able to cut to fund the shift in investment into mental health.

Dr James Kingsland, president of the National Association of Primary Care, says: ‘It’s difficult to know where this money is coming from. There is no formal mechanism for NHS England to ensure money is spent in a certain way other than directives. But there’s also been a big problem in how they measure how the money is spent.’

The £1bn ‘committed’ by NHS England outlined in the taskforce report is different to the £940m pledged by Prime Minister David Cameron in January to go towards specialist care to mums before and after having their babies, mental health services in hospital emergency departments and 24/7 treatment in communities.

Readers' comments (9)

  • Politics and politicians are just great arn't they

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Their honesty and hence, integrity is quite unbelievable . All sympathisers of this government should have seen the truth by now ......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There will be new money for anything. Mirrors....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good news, the mirrors budget will have a generous uplift next year.
    In an unrelated story the smoke budget is being reviewed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Smoke and mirrors +++

    Having been at a few CCG financial presentations, the whole thing is a farce and implosion is probably the only way forward.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Now there's a surprise

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Folks, when you bear in mind that the numbers are predicated on the best financial case scenario for the economy (clearly not the case now with oil/china) and the £22bn savings in the NHS (ditto). To then squeeze further like this - the pips will squeak.

    The road ahead has a yellow hashed box painted on it. Do not enter until your exit is clear.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can this be true?
    Is such a low value placed on MH?
    Are we happy to continue to see Suicide rates three times the rate of deaths on the road?
    Are we still happy to watch people with MH die younger than anyone else in society?
    Are we still happy to see children traumatised and untreated in childhood suffering MH challenges from under 11 years old and be left with lifelong MillH?

    When is there a recognition that writing a figure on paper has no meaning?
    When is there a recognition that to use this approach like this for see a CCG to decrease or stop something else?
    What would you choose....?

    Our esteemed leaders such as Peter Fongahy, Geraldine Strathdee and Paul Farmer (chair of Taskforce), Simon Wessley, Phil Moore.....

    Maybe the money will find but currently this does not look good

    P;) in

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, not an uplift then. A reallocation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.