Paroxetine 'causes harm in adolescents', researchers claim
Paroxetine in not effective in adolescents with major depression and actually causes harm, a reanalysis of a major study has revealed.
The trial - Study 329, funded by GlaxoSmithKline - was first published in 2001, with the results reported as showing paroextine was safe and effective for adolescents.
Now a team has reanalysed the study, this time using previously confidential trial documents, and found neither paroxetine nor another drug tested in the trial was more effective than placebo, whereas there was a clinically significant increase in harms, including suicidal ideation and behaviour.
The authors concluded: ‘Neither paroxetine nor high dose imipramine showed efficacy for major depression in adolescents, and there was an increase in harms with both drugs.’
GPs were advised against prescribing SSRIs to young people in 2003 by the MHRA after concerns they may be linked to increased suicide-related events.
NICE recommends children and young people with moderate to severe depression should be referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) after which they should only be prescribed antidepressants after assessment and diagnosis by a specialist child and adolescent psychiatrist.
GP experts in mental health said the new analysis suggested GPs should be cautious with SSRIs in general and avoid paroxetine altogether.
Professor Carolyn Chew-Graham said the ‘study supports the need for GPs to be cautious with any SSRI, and to avoid paroxetine’.
She said: ‘Guidelines already suggest that GPs need to carefully consider a decision to prescribe any SSRI antidepressant in an adolescent patient with depression, and consider alternatives where possible.’
Professor Chew-Graham added that this should include referral to CAMHS but that ‘many GPs would report long waiting times for appointments and default to prescribing because of this’.
Professor Andre Tylee, emeritus professor of primary care mental health at the Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, said he study re-analysis was ‘helpful to confirm the current advice’.
The re-analysis is the first piece of work to be published in the BMJ as part of an initiative called RIAT – Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials.