Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs will need certification to carry out spirometry by 2021

GPs will have to be certified and placed on a national register to be allowed to perform spirometry under a new scheme set to be implemented by NHS England over the next five years, GP respiratory leads have announced.

The certification scheme – set up with the help of the UK Primary Care Respiratory Society (PCRS-UK) and other expert groups – will mean GPs and practice nurses will have to demonstrate they can perform and interpret spirometry to standards set by the Association for Respiratory Technology and Physiology (ATRP) in order to continue carrying out the lung function tests.

Pulse revealed the scheme was in the pipeline three years ago, following concerns spirometry was ‘sub standard’ in some GP surgeries and leading to as many as two in five people potentially being misdiagnosed with COPD.

The idea raised hackles among some GP experts at the time, who warned certification was over the top and that the limited resources in primary care could even force GPs to stop doing the diagnostic tests.

But GP respiratory experts supporting the ATRP certification scheme told Pulse they believe these concerns have been addressed by planning a phased introduction that means it won’t come into full effect until 2021.

NHS England’s document outlining the scheme explains that GPs already experienced in spirometry can choose to undergo extra training if they need to, before undergoing an assessment by an 'ARTP approved assessor’.

Once certified, GPs will also need to show they are keeping up their competency every three years, with an observed assessment and submission of a ‘comprehensive portfolio’.

The portfolio will ‘include evidence of continued calibration, quality assurance and infection control procedures, evidence of quality spirometric measurements and where interpretation is required, an analysis of five spirometry traces provided by the ARTP to review for technical quality and interpretation’, the document states.

But it adds that ‘to allow sufficient time for the necessary training, assessment and certification infrastructure to be set up, it is proposed to phase the implementation of the recommendations over the four years 1 April – 31 March 2021’.

Dr Stephen Gaduzo, a GP in Stockport and former chair of PCRS-UK, who helped develop the programme said: ‘In many ways, this is formalising and standardising best practice. Healthcare staff are undertaking spirometry currently after taking a range of different training routes, and some may have had little or no formal training.

‘PCRS-UK welcomes this scheme as it will promote the performance and interpretation of spirometry to a consistent high standard by requiring staff to demonstrate their competence in order to join the national register.’

Dr Duncan Keeley, a GP in Oxfordshire who is on the PCRS-UK executive, told Pulse: ‘There are understandable concerns in the general practice community that there is a problem if every procedure done in primary care requires specific and repeated training and certification.

‘But I think there is a need for improvement in standards in spirometry [and] the document has got a long period over which it needs to be implemented, which I think that is very sensible given the current and ongoing financial constraints and the need for better training’

GPs are already required to make sure they perform spirometry to confirm COPD diagnoses under QOF, and are also coming under pressure to use the lung function tests more routinely in diagnosis of asthma.

Readers' comments (59)

  • In that case, it would be less hassle for the practice to refer to the respiratory team for spirometry rather than trying to do it in house.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As we dont get paid for this extra hassle I would agree with the above refer to secondary care.I bet the certification will not be free!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Spirometry is not core. Refer to respiratory. I dont need to be certified because i wont be doing them. Stop doing work for free!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They're deluding themselves. There won't be any GP's in 2021 to certify .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don;t worry about this new outbreak of diplomatosis, there probably won't even BE an NHS by then, so it won't matter at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Primary care is nearly on its knees and here we go with another top down box ticking exercise. Is this really the best way to tackle the problem-more "robust action plans" , "key stakeholders" , "quality driven processes" etc etc. As GP Reg @ 10 29 says why bother? NHSE just don't get it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BY 2012 THERE WILL BE NO GPs LEFT TO "CERTIFY".

    IN TRUTH, WE SHOULD BE "CERTIFIED" FOR CONTINUING TO WORK AS GPs.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another daft idea. This is the problem with zealots. Funding won't be made available for all of this extra (and mostly pointless) micromanagement, GPs will stop offering spirometry and refer in, and costs will multiply tenfold (as they will all then need first outpatient appointments with consultants etc).
    Doesn't the NHS have more pressing things to deal with at this time? Can everyone messing about with (and spending money on) pet projects please just stop, and concentrate on trying to stop the NHS collapsing instead?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Refer everyone. Problem sorted

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent. I shall stop doing it then. Will free up lots of nurse appts for us. The CCG can set up a community clinic we can refer to to have it done and pt can come back with report telling me what it means as clearly I am too stupid to figure that out. Failing that the respiratory dept had better start recruiting as I'll be referring there.
    Sriously - what next ? ECG's / BP readings....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.