Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs should be referred to GMC for persistently over-prescribing antibiotics, says NICE  

GPs who persistently prescribe antibiotics inappropriately should be referred to the GMC and face sanctions under new measures to systematically monitor their individual prescribing of antimicrobials, NICE experts have said.

The threat came as NICE published final guidance on antimicrobial stewardship, recommending GPs have their individual antibiotic prescribing monitored and reviewed at least once a year.

The guideline recommends ‘local systems and processes for peer review of prescribing’ to ‘encourage a culture’ where colleagues question one another where their prescribing practices are ‘not in line with… guidelines and no reason is documented’.

Professor Mark Baker, director of the centre for clinical practice at NICE, explained this could mean that most inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics could be dealt through GPs’ normal appraisal and continuing professional development and a minority of ‘persistent offenders’ could face referral to the GMC and sanctions.

However, the RCGP warned it could be ‘counter-productive’ to threaten hard-pressed GPs with sanctions for inappropriate prescribing.

The guidelines were unveiled in draft form earlier this year and recommend local ‘antimicrobial stewardship teams’ review and provide regular feedback on individual GPs’ prescribing data, as well as local antibiotic resistance rates, to try to tackle areas where inappropriate prescribing is driving the development of resistance.

NICE said it developed the guidance following continuing unexplained growth in antibiotic prescribing, and in line with the Government’s strategy for tackling the threat of antimicrobial resistance – through which public health officials have said GPs should face targets on antibiotic prescribing through the QOF or other contractual measures. GPs in some areas are already being given locally agreed targets as part of their CCG’s quality premium measures.

However, the draft came under criticism after GPs pointed out it would be technically impossible to monitor individual prescriber data under the current system, and called for wider efforts to tackle antimicrobial resistance including better education for the public.

The final NICE recommendations remain largely unchanged from draft, but NICE experts have now revealed that they expect the local stewardship teams to feed the data into the revalidation process and pick up those GPs who are ‘outliers’.

Professor Baker told Pulse: ‘If the measures we’re proposing are put in place, then the prescribing of antimicrobials practiced by every practitioner will be available to form part of their annual appraisal documentation – and outliers can be identified and in some cases will be taken further at a local level.’

Professor Baker added: ‘For “persistent offenders” the ultimate sanction would be a referral to the GMC under its performance procedures. But it’s only very rarely that they ever get to a panel as the vast majority of doctors are wise enough to change their practice before it gets that far.’

Mr Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said that annual appraisals, as part of the revalidation cycle, offer a ‘valuable opportunity’ for GPs to reflect on all aspects of practice including their prescribing – and that ‘we would expect that doctors would undertake any further training that might be identified as part of that process’.

Mr Dickson added: ‘Doctors can, and do, face sanctions for mis-prescribing, although the law dictates that each case has to be considered on its merits to determine whether the doctor’s actions pose a risk to patients or confidence in doctors.’

However Professor Tim Ballard, vice chair of the RCGP said a ‘societal change’ was needed towards the use of antibiotics and that ‘any suggestion that hard pressed GPs - who are already trying to do their jobs in increasingly difficult circumstances - will be reported to the regulator is counter-productive and unhelpful’.

Professor Ballard added: ‘If this were to happen, we would be looking to the General Medical Council to support any GP or other health professional who finds themselves on the receiving end of complaints or criticism about decisions made over the prescribing of antibiotics.’

 

Unsure of the best methods for reducing antibiotic prescribing? Pulse Learning offers tips (£) on how you can implement evidence-based strategies in practice.

Related images

  • Antibiotics-square-online

Readers' comments (93)

  • Doctors are under pressure from all sides , Is it worth working in UK under these circumstances ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps we should invest in finding new antibiotics instead of learning to do cure infection with surgery ..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • talk to the Farmers you morons. until they stop feeding animals abx then the occasional prescription for a week seems less important.
    although some doctors do seem to overuse antibiotics its patient demand and perhaps concern over missing something or litigation that drives this. Admittedly antibiotics for bronchitis seems a common prescription that isn't needed but I guess some docs just worry about missing pneumonia.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GMC referral!!!
    Idiots. Try doing the bloody job and see that were stuck between a rock and a very very hard place. You try and educate people who already arrive in a clinic with ore conceived ideas and refuse antibiotics let's see where this gets you. Delayed scripts help up until a point but it's still a prescription!! Safety netting and proper documentation of every examination finding is necessary now in the case of a complaint....
    Rather than referring individual doctors for torture by our friends in Manchester why not advertise and educate and back doctors up when they make a decision clinically?? How about not allowing joe public to go directly to the gmc in the case we choose not to give them amoxicillin for the cough they just developed 15 minutes ago??

    I'm sick and tired of everyone else telling us how to do out job and threatening us....
    Who the hell signed up to medical school for this??
    As a poster above pointed out also the farming industry standards need to be looked at also.
    As always the problem is partly cultural and attitude related also......target this instead of doctors who on the most part do a damn fine job

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hurling invective is not my way of expression- but NICE stinks !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Big brother piles yet another task onto the camels back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sanctioned if deemed to prescribe inappropriately, and yet sanctioned if the patient Complains. Isn't it wonderful to practice in the UK?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Right. That's it. Tolerance point breached. I quit. Bash some other mug every day. I have done this job for 28 years and the last 5 have been total purgatory. Everything is my fault. Nuts to you. Long walks with the dog on the beach is my new plan. So, Dear Colleagues,.........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And the roar of defence from Maureen and Chaand is, as ever, deafening. Lions led by Donkeys.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So nothing to do with our esteemed betters in hospital, full bloods, CXR, ECG, urinalysis and ABx for EVERYONE who walks through their doors…

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say