Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

‘They've always been remote, but they are getting worse’

Former NICE adviser Dr Nick Summerton on the institute’s guidelines

The guidelines have always been a bit remote and they are getting worse. The problem is, when I Iook at the guidelines in areas I am quite well informed about and know the literature, I ask: why on earth didn’t they involve certain key names?

I’ve been involved for 20 years and I have never heard of most GPs on the guidelines panels and they’re not attracting enough GPs. More worryingly they’re not attracting the best calibre ones, the experts in the areas.

This is because, for consultants it’s a wonderful thing to do. But the GPs on the committee end up having to cover their own practices when we’re not there.

I was ending up out of pocket, because I was paying more for a locum than NICE were willing to give me to attend. Eventually, with great regret, I had to leave the diagnostics advisory group I sat on because I couldn’t afford to go – it was costing me to attend. NICE just didn’t get it.

Dr Nick Summerton is a GP in East Yorkshire who has served on several NICE guideline committees as well as working directly for NICE as a consultant on topic selection for guidelines

Rate this article  (2.6 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (1)

  • they cant be paying much then. If you want to attract the best to come up with authoratitive guidance then money must be put in mouth position.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say