Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Drug schemes provided vital GP support

Making GPs work more for less money is not the solution.

News - GP prescribing incentive schemes face axe

Working more efficiently cannot mean more being done unfunded in primary care.

I really do want to prescribe as efficiently and effectively as possible. Apart from a few gentle nudges, this is usually the case, though there are grey areas where best price may not be best value. I could improve my prescribing by spending my time off going through price lists, running searches and comparing prescribing costs with others.

I could (and do) restrict the practice formulary to more effective and better-value drugs. If I spent longer, the formulary could be updated regularly and be more cost-effective. But this could have a severe impact on my family life and mental health (and bring forward my retirement age).

Consortium executives must realise the jobbing GP has a finite capacity. When incentive schemes are removed, decision makers must expect a drift in performance.

From Dr Nick Chiappe, Plymouth, via

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say