Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs to be assessed on record keeping as part of revalidation

GPs and hospital doctors are set to be assessed on their record keeping as part of revalidation, in a move aimed at improving exchange of information between primary and secondary care.

The move is being proposed by a Government-backed working group which is also looking to hand doctors responsibility for shaping how hospital discharge summaries are structured and the information they contain.

 

The plans have been described as a ‘massively significant' step in improving the quality of medical records across the NHS, and particularly in boosting the quality of hospital discharge records.

A joint working group, established by the Department of Health, tabled a business plan earlier this month for an independent professional record standards development body led by doctors and set up initially under the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, including the RCGP.

A report by the joint working group, chaired by Dr Charles Gutteridge, national clinical director for informatics, claims proper use of professional care standards will be ‘incorporated in mainstream education, and in appraisal and revalidation processes, ensuring widespread adoption and resulting in improved record quality'.

Dr Mark Davies, medical director of the NHS Information Centre and a GP in Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, said: ‘This is massively significant for GPs. At the moment a lot of letters we get are unstructured. We will be able to influence standards.'

The GMC said record keeping was a key part of doctors' appraisals, which would feed into revalidation: ‘Good record keeping helps to ensure patients receive the best possible care.'

Rate this article  (1.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say