Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Election pledges on increasing GP numbers - do they add up?

Pulse analyses the promises from the main parties on expanding the GP workforce

Conservative party logo - online

Conservatives

The Conservative party has committed to training and retaining 5,000 more GPs by 2020 - to allow it to achieve its pledge to provide patients with GP access seven days a week - from 8 ‘til 8 - by 2020. It is not clear how they will do this, although NHS England have just released a £10m plan to expand the GP workforce hammered out with the BMA and others that may help.

But the party’s record on this is not great. In 2012, then health secretary Andrew Lansley pledged a sharp increase in GP trainees by 2015 that is yet to materialise. The number of GPs in the UK has grown under the coalition, but not by enough to keep up with patient demand.

 

Labour party logo - online

Labour

Labour leader Ed Miliband promises that if elected his party would introduce 8,000 more GPs into the system, as part of an overall strategy to boost the NHS’s workforce. The pledge – which would be funded through a £2.5bn investment in the NHS – would see new a ‘Time to Care’ fund support 20,000 more nurses, 5,000 more care workers and 3,000 more midwives alongside the 8,000 new GPs.

Mr Miliband said he was going to raise the extra money for the NHS through a ‘mansion tax’ on properties worth more than £2m, and through taxes on tobacco companies.

 

Liberal Democrats party logo - online

Liberal Democrats

The party has promised to fund NHS England’s plan, the Five Year Forward View ‘in full’, by spending an extra £8bn a year on the NHS by 2020. It has also pledged to train and retain a total of 5,000 more GPs, although no details on funding have been given.

The party has also promised more integrated training for GPs and hospital doctors and also making mental health a key part of training for GPs.

 

UKIP party logo - online

UKIP

Similarly to Labour, the UK Independence Party has said that it will also train another 8,000 GPs. The party has vowed to spend extra £3bn per year on NHS frontline services – allowing it to provide 20,000 new nurses, 3,000 midwives, as well as the 8,000 new GPs.

As part of its strategy to boost GP numbers, UKIP plans to encourage those who have left the profession to come back – in particular female GPs who have left their role before the age of 40. It claims to achieve this by allowing women to take time out from their five-year free tuition fee qualifying period to have families if they wish, and by not charging either women or men for their own re-training on returning to the profession.

 

Green party logo

Green Party

The party will allocate £12bn extra funding that will create a total of 400,000 extra jobs in the NHS and social care.

 

 

Plaid Cymru logo

Plaid Cymru

The party will train and recruit a further 1,000 doctors to the NHS in Wales, and it will offer incentives to encourage them to practise in difficult-to-recruit areas.

 

 

 

Pulse reality check

The reality is that many GP training places are going unfilled and many surveys point to a dramatic increase in GP retirements as morale has plummeted. NHS England’s recent 10-point plan to expand the GP workforce has had a luke-warm reception. In the face of this, all parties will struggle to produce the rapid increase in GP numbers that they are promising over the next Parliament.

Labour and UKIP are promising significant additional investment, but even if all of this was used to train GPs it would not be enough (and they are promising significant numbers of nurses and midwives too). The BMA says it can cost up to £500k to train one GP and this would mean 8,000 more GPs would cost £4bn in funding.

Having said that, if the parties can persuade more expat or retired GPs to return to practise, then they may stand a chance of fulfilling their pledges. But it will be a hard sell.

 

 

 

 

Related images

  • GP training - workforce - online

Rate this article  (3 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (4)

  • those of us left to work on to 67 are so stuffed.

    ex-pats don't fall for it - it's a trap. there is absolutely nothing to look forward to in general practice in the UK.

    can anyone think of one positive proposal for GPs by any of the political parties or NHSE or RCGP or BMA. Nope - neither can I.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like people who have had any experience of general practice, I sigh with exasperation every time yet another politician promise 8000 more GPs. Exactly where are these 8000 GPs coming from! - they act like there are 8000 unemployed GPs sat at home thinking 'nah I don't feel like going to work', and they are seriously struggling to recruit juniors into the profession.

    I'm now at the point where I could train to be a GP. I've taken a couple of years out to consider my options post FY2. I always thought I would be a GP but it looks like a very difficult specialty at the moment so I am reconsidering. The practice I worked at as part of my FY2 job was completely mismanaged, they relied on locums 90% of time time and the trainees there were miserable (and this is in London, not somewhere where they have been understaffed/undersupported for years!). It's hard to know if that experience is typical of general practice or not?? But if it is, it certainly puts of junior doctors like me!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yep ... they add up to zero.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    Scooby-dooby-doo! Where are you?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say